The analysis of video-recorded interaction consists of various professionalized ways of seeing participant behavior through multimodal, co-operative, or intercorporeal lenses. While these perspectives are often adopted simultaneously, each creates a different view of the human body and interaction. Moreover, microanalysis is often produced through local practices of sense-making that involve the researchers’ bodies. It has not been fully elaborated by previous research how adopting these different ways of seeing human behavior influences both what is seen from a video and how it is seen, as well as the way the interpretation of the data ultimately unfolds in the interaction between researchers. In this article, we provide a theoretical-methodological discussion of the microanalytic research process. We explore how it differs from “seeing” affect in interaction either as a co-operative and multimodal action or as an intercorporeal experience. First, we introduce the multimodal conversation analytic, co-operative, and intercorporeal approaches to microanalysis. Second, we apply and compare these practices to a video-recorded interaction of a romantic couple. Furthermore, we examine a video-recorded episode of us, the researchers, reflecting on our analytic observations about this interaction. We suggest that adopting a multimodal and co-operative perspective constructs affect as co-produced and displayed through observable action, while an intercorporeal perspective produces affect as an embodied and experienced phenomenon. While the former enables locating affect in a specific moment and identifiable body parts, the latter facilitates recognizing the experienced side of affect. These different modes of professional vision complement one another in capturing affect in interaction while being fundamentally used in local interactions between the researchers.

中文翻译：

---

作为具身和交互过程的交互分析：将视频数据视为补充专业愿景的多模式、合作和跨体方式

对视频记录交互的分析包括通过多模式、合作或跨体镜头观察参与者行为的各种专业化方式。虽然这些观点经常被同时采用，但每一种观点都会对人体和互动产生不同的看法。此外，微观分析通常是通过涉及研究人员身体的当地意义构建实践产生的。先前的研究尚未完全阐述采用这些不同的观察人类行为的方式如何影响从视频中看到的内容和如何看待它，以及数据的解释最终在研究人员之间的互动中展开的方式。在本文中，我们提供了微观分析研究过程的理论方法讨论。我们探讨了它与作为合作和多模态行动或作为跨体体验的交互中的“看到”影响有何不同。首先，我们介绍了微观分析的多模态对话分析、合作和跨体方法。其次，我们将这些做法应用到一对浪漫情侣的视频录制互动中并进行比较。此外，我们检查了我们研究人员的录像片段，反思我们对这种相互作用的分析观察。我们建议采用多模态和合作视角将情感构建为通过可观察到的行为共同产生和展示，而跨体视角则将情感作为具体化和体验过的现象产生。前者能够定位特定时刻的情感和可识别的身体部位，后者有助于识别情感的经验方面。这些不同的专业视野模式在捕捉交互影响方面相互补充，同时从根本上用于研究人员之间的局部交互。