Drawing on previous research, two hypotheses were tested: (1) the higher the frequency of daily uplifts and use of functional coping strategies, and the lower the frequency of daily hassles and use of dysfunctional coping strategies, the lower the prevalence of stress‐related symptoms will be, and vice versa; and (2) the direct relationship between the personality dimension emotional stability and stress‐related symptoms, will be moderated by daily hassles, daily uplifts and coping processes. A quantitative test of a qualitatively developed model was performed. A questionnaire was sent to all Swedish military veterans who had served in the period 2011–2015 and 1859 individuals (1,614 men and 199 women, 46 individuals did not mark gender) responded (40.5% total response rate). All analyses were made separately for men and women. Comparisons between theoretically favorable and unfavorable profiles across the model variables, daily uplifts, daily hassles, functional coping and dysfunctional coping (based on a cluster analysis), showed considerable differences regarding the prevalence of stress‐related symptoms as predicted by the model and supporting the first hypothesis. Regression and moderation analyses yielded limited support for the second hypothesis. As predicted, female veterans reported a higher frequency of physical, emotional and cognitive stress‐related symptoms than male veterans. The main conclusion is that the theoretical model stood up well when empirically tested and offers a promising approach to future studies on everyday stress and health. The results contribute with new knowledge of military veterans compared to the main stream PTSD, depression and drug abuse‐oriented studies.

中文翻译：

---

瑞典男性和女性退伍军人情绪稳定，烦恼，紧张，应付和与压力相关的症状之间的相互关系

根据先前的研究，检验了两个假设：（1）每天抬高频率和使用功能性应对策略的频率越高，每天麻烦和使用功能性应对策略的频率越低，与压力相关的患病率越低症状会出现，反之亦然；（2）人格维度的情绪稳定性和与压力相关的症状之间的直接关系，将通过日常的烦恼，日常的提神和应对过程来缓解。对定性开发的模型进行了定量测试。向所有在2011-2015年期间服务过的瑞典退伍军人发送了一份调查表，有1859人（1,614名男性和199名女性，未标记性别的46个人）做出了答复（总答复率为40.5％）。所有分析均针对男性和女性进行。在模型变量，每日抬升，每日烦恼，功能性应对和功能障碍性应对之间的理论上有利和不利的概况之间的比较（基于聚类分析），显示了模型所预测的压力相关症状的发生率和支持因素的显着差异。第一个假设。回归和温和分析对第二个假设的支持有限。如所预测的，女性退伍军人报告的与身体，情绪和认知压力有关的症状的发生频率高于男性退伍军人。主要结论是，该理论模型在进行实证检验时表现良好，并为以后的日常压力和健康研究提供了有希望的方法。与主流PTSD相比，该结果有助于获得军人退伍军人的新知识，