当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Physiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Voluntary activation of knee extensor muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Journal of Applied Physiology ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-03 , DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2020
James L Nuzzo 1 , David S Kennedy 2 , Harrison T Finn 1 , Janet L Taylor 1, 3
Affiliation  

We examined if transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a valid tool for assessment of voluntary activation of the knee extensors in healthy individuals. Maximal M-waves (Mmax) of vastus lateralis (VL) were evoked with electrical stimulation of femoral nerve (FNS); Mmax of medial hamstrings (HS) was evoked with electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve branches; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of VL and HS were evoked with TMS; superimposed twitches (SIT) of knee extensors were evoked with FNS and TMS. In Study 1, TMS intensity (69% output(SD 5)) was optimized for MEP sizes, but guidelines for test validity could not be met. Agonist VL MEPs were too small (51.4% Mmax(SD 11.9); guideline ≥70% Mmax) and antagonist HS MEPs were too big (16.5% Mmax(SD 10.3); guideline <10% Mmax). Consequently, the TMS estimated resting twitch (99.1 N(SD 37.2)) and FNS resting twitch (142.4 N(SD 41.8)) were different. In Study 2, SITs at 90% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were similar between TMS (16.1 N(SD 10.3)) and FNS (20.9 N(SD 16.7)), when TMS intensity was optimized for this purpose, suggesting a procedure that combines TMS SITs with FNS resting twitches could be valid. In Study 3, which tested the TMS intensity (56% output(SD 18)) that evoked the largest SIT at 90%MVC, voluntary activation from TMS (87.3%(SD 7.1)) and FNS (84.5%(SD 7.6)) were different. In sum, the contemporary procedure for TMS-based voluntary activation of the knee extensors is invalid. A modified procedure improves validity, but only in individuals who meet rigorous inclusion criteria for SITs and MEPs.

中文翻译:

经颅磁刺激自愿激活膝关节伸肌

我们检查了经颅磁刺激(TMS)是否是评估健康个体中膝关节伸肌自愿激活的有效工具。股神经(FNS)刺激诱发股外侧肌(VL)的最大M波(M max);中号最大内侧腿筋(HS)与坐骨神经分支的电刺激诱发; TMS诱发VL和HS的运动诱发电位(MEP);FNS和TMS诱发膝关节伸肌的叠加抽搐(SIT)。在研究1中,针对MEP大小优化了TMS强度(69%的输出(SD 5)),但无法满足测试有效性的准则。激动剂VL MEP太小(最大51.4%M (SD 11.9);准则≥70%M最大)和拮抗剂HS MEP太大(最大16.5%M (SD 10.3);指南<10%M max)。因此,TMS估计静息抽搐(99.1 N(SD 37.2))和FNS静息抽搐(142.4 N(SD 41.8))不同。在研究2中,当为此目的优化了TMS强度时,TMS(16.1 N(SD 10.3))和FNS(20.9 N(SD 16.7))处于最大自愿收缩(MVC)90%的SIT相似。将TMS SIT与FNS静止抽搐结合使用可能是有效的。在研究3中,测试了TMS强度(56%的输出(SD 18)),其最大的SIT为90%MVC,TMS的自愿激活(87.3%(SD 7.1))和FNS(84.5%(SD 7.6))是不同的。总而言之,当代基于TMS的膝关节伸肌主动激活程序无效。修改后的程序可以提高有效性,但仅限于符合SIT和MEP严格纳入标准的个人。
更新日期:2020-12-03
down
wechat
bug