In the safety risk assessment, since the determination of risk criteria depending on individuals constitutes subjectivity, it raises some doubts about the reliability of the risk assessment results. Determining the consistency of risk criteria will enable more reliable results in risk assessment. In this study, it is aimed for defining the main and sub-risks to which chainsaw operators working in forest logging are exposed, calculating weight levels using and to develop a framework for precaution plans. The risks were identified by six experts by brainstorming using the information obtained as a result of literature review, workplace observations and work evaluations. As a result of the brainstorming, it has been determined six main risk criteria and twenty-nine sub-risk criteria for chainsaw operators. The weights and ranks of the main and sub-risk criteria were determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, using the results of the surveys applied to expert team of thirty-four people. As a result of AHP application, the consistency values (CR) of all risk criteria was determined less than 0.1, and this showed that the decisions made by the experts were consistent. The main risk criteria according to their priorities were determined as psychological (0.208), physical (0.200), technical (0.198), organizational (0.157), biological (0.130) and chemical (0.108) risks. The most priority sub-risk criteria were identified as insufficient security measures (0.079), land conditions (0.066), carelessness (0.062), morale (0.056) and allergic plants (0.049), respectively. The priority order of the risk criteria will shed light on employers in preparing the necessary precaution plans.

在安全风险评估中，由于取决于个人的风险标准的确定构成主观性，因此对风险评估结果的可靠性提出了一些怀疑。确定风险标准的一致性将使风险评估中的结果更加可靠。在这项研究中，其目的是确定从事森林采伐的链锯操作员所面临的主要和次要风险，使用并计算重量水平并制定预防计划的框架。六名专家通过集思广益，使用文献回顾，工作场所观察和工作评估获得的信息，对风险进行了识别。通过集思广益，已确定了电锯操作员的六个主要风险标准和二十九个次风险标准。主要风险和次要风险标准的权重和等级通过层次分析法（AHP）确定，使用的是对三十四人组成的专家组的调查结果。由于AHP的应用，所有风险标准的一致性值（CR）被确定为小于0.1，这表明专家的决策是一致的。根据风险的优先级确定主要风险标准为心理（0.208），身体（0.200），技术（0.198），组织（0.157），生物（0.130）和化学（0.108）风险。最优先考虑的次级风险标准分别是安全措施不足（0.079），土地条件（0.066），粗心（0.062），士气（0.056）和过敏性植物（0.049）。