当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Conserv. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
From wildlife-ism to ecosystem-service-ism to a broader environmentalism
Environmental Conservation ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-24 , DOI: 10.1017/s0376892920000466
Sharachchandra Lele

SummaryThe concept of ‘biodiversity conservation’ includes diverse notions of what part of ‘nature’ one is trying to conserve. Moreover, the conservation discourse is part of a wider discussion on what kind of world we want for both humans and nature. Over the past few decades, debates have erupted on both fronts: what nature is worth saving and how to link concerns for nature with concerns for larger societal well-being. But proposals such as the Global Deal for Nature (www.globaldealfornature.org) articulated by Dinerstein and others suggest that mainstream conservation thinking has not changed much. I argue that acknowledging multiple values about conservation and about society, rejecting the biocentric high horse, pragmatic pluralism and simplistic ‘win–win’ arguments, and embracing a broader set of societal concerns is a more tenable approach towards achieving a balanced society–nature relationship.

中文翻译:

从野生动物主义到生态系统服务主义再到更广泛的环保主义

摘要“生物多样性保护”的概念包括人们试图保护“自然”的哪一部分的不同概念。此外,保护话语是关于我们希望人类和自然都拥有什么样的世界的更广泛讨论的一部分。在过去的几十年里,两个方面都爆发了争论:什么自然值得拯救,以及如何将对自然的关注与对更大社会福祉的关注联系起来。但是诸如“全球自然协议”之类的提案(www.globaldealfornature.org)由 Dinerstein 和其他人阐明,表明主流保护思想没有太大变化。我认为,承认有关保护和社会的多种价值观,拒绝以生物为中心的高马,务实的多元化和简单化的“双赢”论点,并接受更广泛的社会关注,是实现平衡的社会-自然关系的更站得住脚的方法.
更新日期:2020-11-24
down
wechat
bug