In our recent paper “Three‐Level Designs: Evaluation and Comparison for Screening Purposes”, by the same authors, we investigated and compared the original definitive screening designs and the designs that were constructed from weighing matrices. For this purpose, we used the generalized resolution and minimum aberration criteria as well as the projection estimation capacity criterion from the literature to perform the comparison. After our paper was accepted, it came to our attention that there were four significant papers, published by a number of authors, having related content and these were not mentioned in our paper. With this short addendum, we would like to kindly acknowledge the important contributions from those authors in those newly discovered papers in recent literature and also to include them in the related reference list.

中文翻译：

---

关于“三级设计：筛选的评估和比较”的附录

在同一作者的最新论文“三级设计：筛选目的的评估和比较”中，我们调查并比较了原始的最终筛选设计和由称重矩阵构建的设计。为此，我们使用了文献中的广义分辨率和最小像差标准以及投影估计能力标准来进行比较。在我们的论文被接受之后，引起我们注意的是，有四篇重要的论文由许多作者发表，具有相关的内容，而我们的论文中未提及。在此简短的附录中，我们谨感谢那些作者在近期文献中新发现的论文中所做出的重要贡献，并将其纳入相关的参考文献清单中。