ABSTRACT Floods are natural and seasonal phenomena playing a crucial environmental role, but in constructed environments they bring many types of losses. This work analyses the stormwater management master plan (SWMP) in developed and developing cities. Using content analysis, three SWMPs were compared: Joinville – SC and Porto Alegre – RS, in Brazil, and the plan and Maia city, in Portugal. NVivo version 11 software was used. Nodes were categorized and results are presented. Content analysis allowed comparative socio-hydrology by studying different coupled human–water systems across different locations. SWMPs are situated at different levels of planning with respect to water resources management: strategic and operational levels converge on the main objective, tracing different strategies related to conceptual and regulatory points of view. The SWMP is a document whose scope extends beyond mapping technical needs; it involves an element of public planning and administration to avoid the loss of lives and economics, as well as to increase resilience, and it is an essential document for urban water governance.

中文翻译：

---

关于雨水管理总体规划：比较发达和发展中城市

摘要 洪水是自然和季节性现象，在环境中起着至关重要的作用，但在建筑环境中，它们会带来多种损失。这项工作分析了发达和发展中城市的雨水管理总体规划 (SWMP)。使用内容分析，对三个 SWMP 进行了比较：Joinville – SC 和 Porto Alegre – RS，在巴西，以及计划和马亚市，在葡萄牙。使用 NVivo 版本 11 软件。对节点进行分类并显示结果。内容分析允许通过研究不同地点的不同耦合的人水系统来比较社会水文学。SWMP 位于与水资源管理相关的不同规划级别：战略和运营级别集中在主要目标上，追踪与概念和监管观点相关的不同战略。SWMP 是一份文件，其范围超出了制图技术需求；它涉及公共规划和管理的一个要素，以避免生命和经济损失，以及提高复原力，它是城市水治理的重要文件。