Funding is vital for the survival of science and thereby development and sovereignty of a country and should look to the quality of the product. This paper looks at funding citations in Incites ® database by Brazilian authors. Almost 70% of the documents in this study were funded by one of 10 Brazilian agencies, mainly Capes, CNPq and FAPESP. Although federal agencies (Capes and Cnpq) are important nationwide, the funding agency from São Paulo state (FAPESP) was seen to have national impact, probably due to collaboration of researchers from other states with universities in São Paulo. The impact of these agencies was lower than when science was funded by foreign sources, which were mainly North American and European. Eighty companies (primarily manufacturing and pharmaceutical) were also seen to fund research in Brazil, none being national. Clusters were formed of co-funding foreign agencies using quality indicators. Cluster separation depended mainly on journal impact factor, open/closed access and % documents in Q1 journals. Using Capes data, citation rates are also low, which may account for 30% of papers nationwide without funding information.

中文翻译：

---

在巴西资助研究

资金对于科学的生存以及国家的发展和主权至关重要，应该关注产品的质量。本文着眼于巴西作者在 Incites ® 数据库中的资金引用情况。本研究中近 70% 的文件由巴西 10 个机构之一资助，主要是 Capes、CNPq 和 FAPESP。尽管联邦机构（Capes 和 Cnpq）在全国范围内很重要，但圣保罗州的资助机构 (FAPESP) 被认为具有全国影响力，这可能是由于其他州的研究人员与圣保罗大学的合作。这些机构的影响低于由外国来源（主要是北美和欧洲）资助科学时的影响。也有 80 家公司（主要是制造和制药公司）为巴西的研究提供资金，但没有一家是全国性的。集群由使用质量指标的共同资助外国机构组成。集群分离主要取决于期刊影响因子、开放/封闭访问和 Q1 期刊中的文档百分比。使用 Capes 数据，引用率也很低，这可能占全国没有资金信息的论文的 30%。