当前位置: X-MOL 学术Adv. Mater. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Flat Lenses Based on 2D Perovskite Nanosheets
Advanced Materials ( IF 29.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-17 , DOI: 10.1002/adma.202006053
Ziyu Wang , Tieshan Yang , Yupeng Zhang , Qingdong Ou , Han Lin , Qianhui Zhang , Huanyang Chen , Hui Ying Hoh , Baohua Jia , Qiaoliang Bao

Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001388

The units in Figure 3c,d and Figure 5a–d of the originally published article are hereby corrected. In Figure 3c,d, the units on the x‐axis and y‐axis of (c) should be x(λ) and z(λ). The units of x‐axis, y‐axis, and z‐axis of (d) should be x(λ), y(λ), and z(λ). These replace x(µm) and y(µm) for (c) and x(µm), y(µm), and z(µm) for (d). The corrected Figure 3c,d is shown below.

image
Figure 3
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
c) Intensity distribution of the focusing spot in the x–z plane. d) 3D representation of the focal spot. Three shells correspond to 0.4, 0.6, and 0.9 of the peak intensity, respectively.
image
Figure 5
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
a,b) The experimental lateral (a) and axial (b) intensity distributions in the xy and xz planes. c,d) The cross‐section intensity profiles along the y direction (c) and the z direction (d). e) 2D lateral (black) and axial (blue) focal spot size as a function of thickness of 2D perovskite. f) Cross‐section lateral focal intensity of 2D perovskites with different compositions.

The main text on Page 5 (line 13–15, right column), “Figures 3c and d illustrate the simulated intensity distribution of the focusing point in the xy plane and its 3D representation, respectively” is also corrected to: “Figures 3c and d illustrate the simulated intensity distribution of the focusing point in the x–z plane and its 3D representation, respectively.”

Similarly, in Figure 5a,b, the labels on the x‐axis are corrected to x(µm) instead of x(λ) and the labels in Figure 5c,d are corrected for consistency. In Figure 5f, the intensity is normalized here in order to make a clear lens performance comparison between the perovskite‐based lenses with different compositions. The corrected Figure 5 is shown below:



中文翻译:

基于二维钙钛矿纳米片的平面透镜

进阶 母校 202032,2001388

特此更正原始发表文章的图3c,d和图5a–d中的单位。在图3c,d中,(c)在x轴和y轴上的单位应为x(λ)和z(λ)。(d)的x轴,y轴和z轴的单位应为x(λ),y(λ)和z(λ)。这些替换X(μm)与ÿ(微米)为(c)和X(μm)时,ÿ(μm)和Ž(微米)为(d)。校正后的图3c,d如下所示。

图片
图3
在图形查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
c)焦点在x–z平面上的强度分布。d)焦点的3D表示。三个壳分别对应于峰值强度的0.4、0.6和0.9。
图片
图5
在图形查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
a,b)在xyxz平面中的实验横向(a)和轴向(b)强度分布。c,d)沿y方向(c)和z方向(d)的横截面强度分布。e)2D横向(黑色)和轴向(蓝色)焦斑大小随2D钙钛矿厚度的变化而变化。f)具有不同成分的二维钙钛矿的横截面横向聚焦强度。

第5页(线13-15,右列)上的主文本,“图3c和d示出在聚焦点的模拟强度分布X - ÿ平面和其3D表示的,分别为”也被校正到:“图图3c和d分别说明了x–z平面中焦点的模拟强度分布及其3D表示。”

类似地,在图5a,b中,将x轴上的标签校正为x(µm)而不是x(λ),并针对一致性将图5c,d中的标签校正。在图5f中,此处的强度被归一化,以便在具有不同成分的钙钛矿型镜片之间进行清晰的镜片性能比较。校正后的图5如下所示:

更新日期:2020-11-17
down
wechat
bug