This systematic literature review synthesizes the major physical and socio-physical determinants on space choice behaviors in open (i.e., non-defined uses) versus enclosed (i.e., specific uses defined) spaces. The purpose is to better understand the trade-offs between open and enclosed spaces and how opposing and complimentary design elements influence behavior and occupancy choices. Using the lens of space choice behaviors, we hypothesize that similar design challenges exists at both scales, and that analogous insights can be applied to both urban planning and building design. We analyze the focus areas, research drivers, locations, and methods applied in the reviewed studies, and find overlapping similarities within research at both scales, particularly in the methods applied. The drivers for research into buildings tend to be more about optimizing space allocation, whereas lifestyles and well-being are more common in urban studies. We synthesize the content of the literature and find that challenges of successful public and common spaces in cities and buildings are similar in terms of trade-offs, barriers, and impacts on user activities. The implementation of diverse open spaces create more flexibility and adaptability to changing trends, attract different interest groups, and ultimately provide more synergistic benefits to the use of buildings and cities.

这份系统的文献综述综合了在开放（即非定义用途）与封闭（即特定用途定义）空间中空间选择行为的主要物理和社会物理决定因素。目的是更好地了解开放空间和封闭空间之间的权衡，以及相互对立的互补设计元素如何影响行为和入住选择。使用空间选择行为的镜头，我们假设在两个尺度上都存在相似的设计挑战，并且类似的见解可以应用于城市规划和建筑设计。我们分析了所研究的重点领域，研究驱动因素，位置和方法，并发现两个尺度上的研究中存在重叠的相似之处，尤其是在所应用的方法上。建筑研究的驱动力往往更多地在于优化空间分配，而生活方式和幸福感在城市研究中更为常见。我们综合了文献的内容，发现在取舍，障碍和对用户活动的影响方面，成功实现城市和建筑物中公共场所和公共场所的挑战是相似的。实施多样化的开放空间可为不断变化的趋势提供更大的灵活性和适应性，吸引不同的兴趣群体，并最终为建筑物和城市的使用提供更多的协同效益。以及对用户活动的影响。实施多样化的开放空间可为不断变化的趋势提供更大的灵活性和适应性，吸引不同的兴趣群体，并最终为建筑物和城市的使用提供更多的协同效益。以及对用户活动的影响。实施多样化的开放空间可为不断变化的趋势提供更大的灵活性和适应性，吸引不同的兴趣群体，并最终为建筑物和城市的使用提供更多的协同效益。