Individuals with insomnia complaints often report intrusive thoughts. In this sense, strategies to cope with cognitive arousal are a key topic to be addressed. The TCQI-R is a self-reporting instrument aimed at evaluating the strategies used by individuals to control their thoughts during insomnia episodes. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the thought control questionnaire insomnia-revised (TCQI-R) for the Portuguese population. In the current study, a community-dwelling sample of 802 participants was recruited, aged between 18 and 66 years, of whom 163 were men and 639 women (80%). The principal component analysis found five components: reappraisal, cognitive distraction, aggressive suppression, worry and behavioral distraction. Both the general questionnaire (α = 0.91) and the components showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α between 0.74 and 0.84). Through the analyses carried out, it was possible to conclude that the instrument has a good discriminatory capacity between individuals with and without "insomnia". It was also found that the use of worry and aggressive suppression strategies was associated with greater insomnia severity, anxiety, depression, and thought catastrophizing, whereas the use of cognitive distraction strategy was associated with lower severity of insomnia, anxiety, depression, and thought catastrophizing. The results of the current study are in line with the published literature on the TCQI-R. The TCQI-R seems to be a useful tool for the assessment of intrusive thoughts’ control strategies.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲葡萄牙语验证的思维控制问卷失眠修订版 (TCQI-R)

有失眠主诉的人经常报告侵入性想法。从这个意义上说，应对认知唤醒的策略是一个需要解决的关键话题。TCQI-R 是一种自我报告工具，旨在评估个人在失眠发作期间控制自己思想的策略。本研究的目的是翻译和调整针对葡萄牙人口的失眠修订版思维控制问卷 (TCQI-R)。在当前的研究中，招募了 802 名年龄在 18 至 66 岁之间的社区居民样本，其中男性 163 人，女性 639 人（80%）。主成分分析发现五个成分：重新评估、认知分心、攻击性抑制、担心和行为分心。一般问卷 (α = 0. 91) 并且组件显示出良好的内部一致性（Cronbach's α 介于 0.74 和 0.84 之间）。通过进行的分析，可以得出结论，该工具在有和没有“失眠”的个体之间具有良好的区分能力。还发现使用担心和积极的抑制策略与更严重的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关，而使用认知分心策略与较低严重程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关. 当前研究的结果与已发表的关于 TCQI-R 的文献一致。TCQI-R 似乎是评估侵入性思想控制策略的有用工具。可以得出结论，该文书对患有和不患有"失眠症"的个人具有良好的区分能力。还发现使用担心和积极的抑制策略与更严重的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关，而使用认知分心策略与较低严重程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关. 当前研究的结果与已发表的关于 TCQI-R 的文献一致。TCQI-R 似乎是评估侵入性思想控制策略的有用工具。可以得出结论，该文书对患有和不患有"失眠症"的个人具有良好的区分能力。还发现使用担心和积极的抑制策略与更严重的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关，而使用认知分心策略与较低严重程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关. 当前研究的结果与已发表的关于 TCQI-R 的文献一致。TCQI-R 似乎是评估侵入性思想控制策略的有用工具。还发现使用担心和积极的抑制策略与更严重的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关，而使用认知分心策略与较低严重程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关. 当前研究的结果与已发表的关于 TCQI-R 的文献一致。TCQI-R 似乎是评估侵入性思想控制策略的有用工具。还发现使用担心和积极抑制策略与更大程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关，而使用认知分心策略与较低严重程度的失眠、焦虑、抑郁和思维灾难相关. 当前研究的结果与已发表的关于 TCQI-R 的文献一致。TCQI-R 似乎是评估侵入性思想控制策略的有用工具。