当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
J. Transp. Geogr.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How could the station-based bike sharing system and the free-floating bike sharing system be coordinated?
Journal of Transport Geography ( IF 5.899 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102896 Long Cheng , Junjian Yang , Xuewu Chen , Mengqiu Cao , Hang Zhou , Yu Sun
Journal of Transport Geography ( IF 5.899 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102896 Long Cheng , Junjian Yang , Xuewu Chen , Mengqiu Cao , Hang Zhou , Yu Sun
Abstract The station-based bike sharing system (SBBSS) and the free-floating bike sharing system (FFBSS) have been adopted on a large scale in China. However, the overlap between the services provided by these two systems often makes bike sharing inefficient. By comparing the factors that affect the usage of the two systems, this paper aims to propose appropriate strategies to promote their coordinated development. Using data collected in Nanjing, a predictive model is built to determine which system is more suitable at a given location. The influences of infrastructure, demand distribution, and land use attributes at the station level are examined via the support vector machine (SVM) approach. Our results show that the SBBSS tends to be favored in areas where there is a high concentration of travel demand, and close proximity to metro stations and commercial properties, whereas locations with a higher density of major roads and residential properties are associated with more frequent use of the FFBSS. With regard to the methods used, a comparison of several machine learning approaches shows that the SVM has the best predictive performance. Our findings could be used to help policy makers and transportation planners to optimize the deployment and redistribution of docked and dockless bikes.
更新日期：2020-12-01
京公网安备 11010802027423号