当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Thermophys. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Investigation of Energy Saving Potential in Buildings Using Novel Developed Lightweight Concrete
International Journal of Thermophysics ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s10765-020-02761-1
Ahmet Erhan Akan , Fatih Ünal , Fatih Koçyiğit

In this study, three different composite materials were produced from mixtures of natural and waste materials in different proportions. The produced composites were used to determine the insulation thickness of exterior walls of buildings located in 12 provinces selected from the four different climate zones of Turkey. The selection of provinces was made according to Turkish standard TS 825. The produced materials are thermal insulation elements that can be used instead of construction elements, such as brick, on the exterior walls of the buildings. In this study, only the heating of the buildings was considered and the number of heating degree days of the provinces was taken into account to determine the insulation thickness. The life cycle cost analysis method was used to determine the optimum insulation thickness. It was determined that the optimum insulation thickness values calculated for four different fuel types for the selected provinces varied between 0.170 m and 1.401 m. The annual energy requirement for the unit surface area of the exterior walls of the insulated buildings was determined to be 11,213–965,715 kJ·m−2 per year. Moreover, it was determined that the insulation costs ranged between $ 22,841 m−2 and $ 114,841 m−2, and the payback period ranged from approximately 2.5 to 6.5 years. It was concluded that using these new types of materials in the determined regions were advantageous in terms of thermal insulation, fire resistance, mechanical properties, production costs, extra labor costs, and optimum insulation thickness.

中文翻译:

新型轻质混凝土建筑节能潜力研究

在这项研究中,三种不同的复合材料由不同比例的天然材料和废料混合物制成。所生产的复合材料用于确定位于土耳其四个不同气候区的 12 个省的建筑物外墙的保温厚度。省份的选择是根据土耳其标准 TS 825 进行的。生产的材料是隔热元件,可用于代替建筑物外墙上的砖等建筑元件。本研究仅考虑建筑物的供暖情况,并考虑各省的供暖度天数来确定保温厚度。采用生命周期成本分析法确定最佳保温层厚度。经确定,针对选定省份的四种不同燃料类型计算的最佳绝缘厚度值在 0.170 m 和 1.401 m 之间变化。隔热建筑外墙单位表面积的年能源需求确定为每年 11,213–965,715 kJ·m-2。此外,确定绝缘成本介于 $22,841 m-2 和 $114,841 m-2 之间,投资回收期介于大约 2.5 到 6.5 年之间。得出的结论是,在确定的区域使用这些新型材料在隔热、耐火、机械性能、生产成本、额外人工成本和最佳隔热厚度方面具有优势。170 m 和 1.401 m。隔热建筑外墙单位表面积的年能源需求确定为每年 11,213–965,715 kJ·m-2。此外,确定绝缘成本介于 $22,841 m-2 和 $114,841 m-2 之间,投资回收期介于大约 2.5 到 6.5 年之间。得出的结论是,在确定的区域使用这些新型材料在隔热、耐火、机械性能、生产成本、额外人工成本和最佳隔热厚度方面具有优势。170 m 和 1.401 m。隔热建筑外墙单位表面积的年能源需求确定为每年 11,213–965,715 kJ·m-2。此外,确定绝缘成本介于 $22,841 m-2 和 $114,841 m-2 之间,投资回收期介于大约 2.5 到 6.5 年之间。得出的结论是,在确定的区域使用这些新型材料在隔热、耐火、机械性能、生产成本、额外人工成本和最佳隔热厚度方面具有优势。投资回收期约为 2.5 至 6.5 年。得出的结论是,在确定的区域使用这些新型材料在隔热、耐火、机械性能、生产成本、额外人工成本和最佳隔热厚度方面具有优势。投资回收期约为 2.5 至 6.5 年。得出的结论是,在确定的区域使用这些新型材料在隔热、耐火、机械性能、生产成本、额外人工成本和最佳隔热厚度方面具有优势。
更新日期:2020-10-27
down
wechat
bug