This study provides a unified presentation of thermoluminescence (TL) glow-curve deconvolution within the framework of the open source R package “tgcd”, according to various analytical expressions that describe first-, second-, general-, and mixed-order kinetics as well as the recently developed semi-analytical expressions that derive from the one trap-one recombination center (OTOR) model that utilizes the Lambert W function or the Wright Omega function. We provide a comprehensive, flexible, convenient, and openly accessible program to analyze TL glow curves according to different models and expressions. The consistency of kinetic parameters determined using different model expressions was assessed using measured TL glow curve of CaF2:Dy. The performance of the computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) method was also tested using simulated glow curves. Results revealed the benefits of comparing kinetic parameters determined from different model expressions and those obtained using experimental TL evaluation methods to assess the reliability of deconvolution results. The accuracy of the CGCD method is dependent upon both the model expressions used and the intrinsic trapping parameters of the TL material.

这项研究根据描述第一，第二，一般和混合动力学的各种解析表达式，在开源R包“ tgcd”的框架内提供了热致发光（TL）辉光曲线去卷积的统一表示。以及最近开发的半解析表达式，这些表达式是从利用Lambert W函数或Wright Omega函数的一个陷阱一重组中心（OTOR）模型得出的。我们提供了一个全面，灵活，方便且可公开访问的程序，可以根据不同的模型和表达式来分析TL辉光曲线。使用测量的CaF2：Dy TL发光曲线评估使用不同模型表达式确定的动力学参数的一致性。还使用模拟辉光曲线对计算机辉光曲线反卷积（CGCD）方法的性能进行了测试。结果揭示了比较从不同模型表达式确定的动力学参数和使用实验TL评估方法获得的动力学参数以评估去卷积结果的可靠性的好处。CGCD方法的准确性取决于所使用的模型表达式和TL材料的固有捕获参数。