We study gender differences in the evaluation of submissions to economics conferences. Using data from the Annual Congress of the European Economic Association (2015-2017), the Annual Meeting of the Spanish Economic Association (2012-2017), and the Spring Meeting of Young Economists (2017), we find that all-female-authored papers are 3.2 p.p. (6.8%) less likely to be accepted than all-male-authored papers. This gap is present after controlling for (i) number of authors, (ii) referee fixed effects, (iii) field, (iv) cites of the paper at submission year, (v) previous publication record of the authors, and (vi) the quality of the affiliations of the authors. We also find that the gap is entirely driven by male referees - female referees evaluate male and female-authored papers similarly, but male referees are more favorable towards papers written by men.

中文翻译：

---

研究评估中的性别差距：来自提交给经济学会议的证据

我们研究了经济学会议论文评估中的性别差异。使用欧洲经济协会年会（2015-2017）、西班牙经济协会年会（2012-2017）和青年经济学家春季会议（2017）的数据，我们发现全女性作者论文被接受的可能性比全男性撰写的论文低 3.2 pp (6.8%)。在控制 (i) 作者数量、(ii) 裁判固定效应、(iii) 领域、(iv) 论文提交年份的引用次数、(v) 作者以前的出版记录以及 (vi ) 作者的隶属关系的质量。我们还发现这种差距完全是由男审稿人造成的——女审稿人对男性和女性撰写的论文的评价相似，