当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effect of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress on Endothelial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Humans
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-14 , DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00257.2020
Holden W Hemingway 1 , Amy M Moore 1 , Albert H Olivencia-Yurvati 1, 2 , Steven A Romero 1
Affiliation  

Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rodent and cell models. However, the contribution of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the pathogenesis of endothelial I/R injury in humans is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that compared with placebo, inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress via ingestion of tauroursodeoxycholic acid would prevent the attenuation of endothelium-dependent vasodilation following I/R injury. Twelve young adults (six women) were studied following ingestion of a placebo or 1,500 mg tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (duplex ultrasonography) before and after I/R injury, which was induced by 20 min of arm ischemia followed by 20 min of reperfusion. Endothelium-independent vasodilation (glyceryl trinitrate-mediated vasodilation) was also assessed after I/R injury. Compared with placebo, TUDCA ingestion increased circulating plasma concentrations by 145 ± 90 ng ml-1 and increased concentrations of the taurine unconjugated form, ursodeoxycholic acid by 560 ± 156 ng ml-1 (both P < 0.01). Ischemia-reperfusion injury attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation, an effect that did not differ between placebo (pre-I/R, 5.0 ± 2.1% vs. post-I/R 3.5 ± 2.2%) and TUDCA (pre-I/R, 5.6 ± 2.1% vs. post-I/R 3.9 ± 2.1%; P = 0.8) conditions. Similarly, endothelium-independent vasodilation did not differ between conditions (placebo, 19.6 ± 4.8% vs. TUDCA, 19.7 ± 6.1%; P = 0.9). Taken together, endoplasmic reticulum stress does not appear to contribute to endothelial I/R injury in healthy young adults.

中文翻译:

内质网应激对人内皮缺血再灌注损伤的影响

内质网应激有助于啮齿动物和细胞模型的缺血再灌注 (I/R) 损伤。然而,内质网应激在人类内皮 I/R 损伤发病机制中的作用尚不清楚。我们测试了这样一个假设,即与安慰剂相比,通过摄入牛磺熊去氧胆酸抑制内质网应激将防止 I/R 损伤后内皮依赖性血管舒张的减弱。在摄入安慰剂或 1,500 毫克牛磺熊去氧胆酸 (TUDCA) 后,对 12 名年轻成人(6 名女性)进行了研究。在 I/R 损伤之前和之后,通过肱动脉血流介导的扩张(双工超声检查)评估内皮依赖性血管舒张,其由 20 分钟的手臂缺血和 20 分钟的再灌注诱导。I/R 损伤后还评估了不依赖于内皮的血管舒张(三硝酸甘油酯介导的血管舒张)。与安慰剂相比,TUDCA 摄入使循环血浆浓度增加了 145 ± 90 ng ml-1并且牛磺酸未结合形式熊去氧胆酸的浓度增加了 560 ± 156 ng ml -1(均 P < 0.01)。缺血再灌注损伤减弱了内皮依赖性血管舒张,这种作用在安慰剂(I/R 前,5.0 ± 2.1% 与 I/R 后 3.5 ± 2.2%)和 TUDCA(I/R 前, 5.6 ± 2.1% 与 I/R 后 3.9 ± 2.1%;P = 0.8) 条件。同样,内皮非依赖性血管舒张在不同条件下也没有差异(安慰剂,19.6 ± 4.8% 与 TUDCA,19.7 ± 6.1%;P = 0.9)。总之,内质网应激似乎不会导致健康年轻人的内皮 I/R 损伤。
更新日期:2020-10-15
down
wechat
bug