To explore which TLIF techniques are advantageous in reducing the risk of complications and conducive to bone fusion under the vibration. The L1-L5 finite element lumbar model was modified to simulate three different TLIF techniques (a unilateral standard cage, a crescent-shaped cage, and bilateral standard cages). The results showed that the crescent-shaped cage may reduce the risk of subsidence and provide a more stable and suitable environment for vertebral cell growth under the vibration compared to the other TLIF techniques. Unilateral cage may increase the risk of adjacent segment disease and cage failure including fatigue failure under vibration.

中文翻译：

---

三种 TLIF 技术在振动下对融合段和相邻段的动态响应比较

探讨哪些TLIF技术有利于降低并发症的风险，有利于振动下的骨融合。修改 L1-L5 有限元腰椎模型以模拟三种不同的 TLIF 技术（单侧标准笼、月牙形笼和双侧标准笼）。结果表明，与其他 TLIF 技术相比，新月形笼可以降低下沉的风险，并为椎体细胞在振动下的生长提供更稳定、更合适的环境。单边保持架可能会增加相邻节段疾病和保持架失效的风险，包括振动下的疲劳失效。