当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
Indoor Air
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Concurrent assessment of personal, indoor, and outdoor PM2.5 and PM1 levels and source contributions using novel low‐cost sensing devices
Indoor Air ( IF 5.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-12 , DOI: 10.1111/ina.12763 Shih‐Chun Candice Lung, Ming‐Chien Mark Tsou, Shu‐Chuan Hu, Yu‐Hui Hsieh, Wen‐Cheng Vincent Wang, Chen‐Kai Shui, Chee‐Hong Tan
Indoor Air ( IF 5.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-12 , DOI: 10.1111/ina.12763 Shih‐Chun Candice Lung, Ming‐Chien Mark Tsou, Shu‐Chuan Hu, Yu‐Hui Hsieh, Wen‐Cheng Vincent Wang, Chen‐Kai Shui, Chee‐Hong Tan
The intensity, frequency, duration, and contribution of distinct PM2.5 sources in Asian households have seldom been assessed; these are evaluated in this work with concurrent personal, indoor, and outdoor PM2.5 and PM1 monitoring using novel low‐cost sensing (LCS) devices, AS‐LUNG. GRIMM‐comparable observations were acquired by the corrected AS‐LUNG readings, with R2 up to 0.998. Twenty‐six non‐smoking healthy adults were recruited in Taiwan in 2018 for 7‐day personal, home indoor, and home outdoor PM monitoring. The results showed 5‐min PM2.5 and PM1 exposures of 11.2 ± 10.9 and 10.5 ± 9.8 µg/m3, respectively. Cooking occurred most frequently; cooking with and without solid fuel contributed to high PM2.5 increments of 76.5 and 183.8 µg/m3 (1 min), respectively. Incense burning had the highest mean PM2.5 indoor/outdoor (1.44 ± 1.44) ratios at home and on average the highest 5‐min PM2.5 increments (15.0 µg/m3) to indoor levels, among all single sources. Certain events accounted for 14.0%‐39.6% of subjects’ daily exposures. With the high resolution of AS‐LUNG data and detailed time‐activity diaries, the impacts of sources and ventilations were assessed in detail.
更新日期：2020-10-12
京公网安备 11010802027423号