当前位置: X-MOL 学术Human Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Industries › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Methodological issues in systems Human Factors and Ergonomics: Perspectives on the research–practice gap, reliability and validity, and prediction
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-06 , DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20873
Paul M. Salmon 1 , Gemma J. M. Read 1 , Guy H. Walker 2 , Nicholas J. Stevens 1 , Adam Hulme 1 , Scott McLean 1 , Neville A. Stanton 3
Affiliation  

The changing nature of work and society, and a proliferation of complex global challenges, is increasing the need for systems Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE). The discipline is well equipped to respond, but there remain a number of longstanding issues preventing systems HFE from realizing its full impact. There is a research–practice gap, a lack of reliability and validity evidence associated with systems HFE methods, and a shortage of methods that can predict behavior. In this article we revisit each issue, with each co-author providing their own perspective on the extent and causes of each issue, and their resolution. The perspectives reveal a consensus that the issues exist and are problematic but are challenging, multi-factorial, and require various solutions. The findings are subsequently synthesized to form an agenda for the wider discipline.

中文翻译:

系统中的方法论问题人为因素和人体工程学:研究与实践差距、可靠性和有效性以及预测的观点

工作和社会不断变化的性质以及复杂的全球挑战的扩散,正在增加对系统人因和人体工程学 (HFE) 的需求。该学科具备良好的应对能力,但仍有许多长期存在的问题阻碍了系统 HFE 实现其全部影响。研究与实践之间存在差距,缺乏与系统 HFE 方法相关的可靠性和有效性证据,并且缺乏可以预测行为的方法。在本文中,我们重新审视了每个问题,每位合著者都对每个问题的程度和原因及其解决方案发表了自己的看法。这些观点揭示了一个共识,即这些问题存在且存在问题,但具有挑战性、多因素且需要各种解决方案。
更新日期:2020-10-06
down
wechat
bug