当前位置: X-MOL 学术Bioscience › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Publishing Environmental Assessment and Management Science: Crossing the Hurdles
BioScience ( IF 10.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-30 , DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa107
Rebecca A Efroymson 1 , Mark J Peterson 1
Affiliation  

Abstract Benefits accrue to scientists, resource managers, companies, and policymakers when environmental scientists publish in peer-reviewed journals. However, environmental scientists and practitioners face challenges, including the sometimes low value placed on journal articles, institutional vested interests in outcomes, and the changing priorities of employers and project sponsors. Confidentiality agreements can also lead scientists to assume publication is not an option. Case studies may be viewed by potential authors as too routine for peer-reviewed journals. On the basis of 30 years of experience, we suggest that publishing hurdles can be overcome and that environmental scientists have a range of options. The topics of manuscripts can include not only results from case studies and perspectives based on them but also byproducts of assessments, including definitions, plans, monitoring methods and models, and decision frameworks. Environmental scientists have unique opportunities to move science forward with their practical knowledge if they can move across the institutional, logistical, data-related, and content-related hurdles.

中文翻译:

出版环境评估和管理科学:跨越障碍

摘要 当环境科学家在同行评审期刊上发表文章时,科学家、资源管理者、公司和政策制定者都会受益。然而,环境科学家和从业者面临挑战,包括有时对期刊文章的重视程度较低、机构对结果的既得利益以及雇主和项目发起人不断变化的优先事项。保密协议也可能导致科学家认为发表文章不是一种选择。潜在作者可能会认为案例研究对于同行评审期刊来说过于常规。根据 30 年的经验,我们建议可以克服出版障碍,并且环境科学家有多种选择。手稿的主题不仅可以包括案例研究的结果和基于它们的观点,还可以包括评估的副产品,包括定义、计划、监测方法和模型以及决策框架。如果环境科学家能够跨越制度、后勤、数据相关和内容相关的障碍,他们就有独特的机会利用他们的实践知识推动科学向前发展。
更新日期:2020-09-30
down
wechat
bug