Moodle is one of the most widely used learning management systems currently and has traditionally been studied through the Technology Acceptance Model. Existing literature is scattered and does not allow us to clearly conclude what characteristics this technological acceptance has as well as its main progress. The study aimed to provide an overview of the scientific literature on the application of TAM in the study of the acceptance and technological use of Moodle through a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS). Results from 24 selected studies indicate that the topic is of increasing interest and that the literature is characterized by studies that 1) use extended versions of TAM; 2) are based on university students from different programs; 3) take place in Europe or Asia; 4) are published in journals with different impact factors; and 5) have focused on testing mainly the original TAM hypotheses. Although a lot of hypotheses have been studied (271), only 16 have been accepted more times than rejected by 2 or more studies, with Perceived Ease of Use being the most commonly present construct in the hypotheses. Results imply that although TAM remains as a robust model for studying Moodle there are still important gaps to be addressed.

Moodle是当前使用最广泛的学习管理系统之一，传统上是通过技术接受模型进行研究的。现有文献零散，不能使我们清楚地得出这种技术接受的特征及其主要进展。该研究旨在通过系统制图研究（SMS）提供有关TAM在Moodle接受和技术使用研究中的应用的科学文献的概述。来自24项选定研究的结果表明，该主题越来越受关注，并且文献的特征在于以下研究：1）使用TAM的扩展版本；2）基于来自不同计划的大学生；3）发生在欧洲或亚洲；4）在影响因子不同的期刊上发表；和5）主要集中于检验原始TAM假设。尽管已经研究了许多假设（271），但接受2次或更多次研究拒绝的次数比接受16次的次数要多，其中“易用性”是假设中最常见的构造。结果表明，尽管TAM仍然是研究Moodle的可靠模型，但仍存在重要的差距需要解决。