It is necessary to ensure that the combination of blended learning forms is suitable for the type of learning style. Experiments conducted with a 3 × 4 design, online-face-to-face composition (25–75, 50–50, 75–25) implemented into four groups of learning style types (Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, Accommodator). We took a total of seven participants randomly and placed them in each group. The data collected was analyzed by 2-Way Anova, Sig .05. Both the variety of compositions and the types of learning styles differed significantly in their competence. Based on the test of the average difference in the type of learning style group, some are not considerably different, but providing essential instructions to be considered in choosing the form of blended learning in the student group based on the type of learning style.

必须确保混合学习形式的组合适合于学习风格的类型。使用3×4设计，在线面对面构图（25–75、50–50、75–25）进行的实验被实现为四组学习风格类型（Diverger，Assimilator，Converger，Accommodator）。我们总共随机抽取了七名参与者，并将他们放在每组中。收集的数据由2-Way Anova，Sig .05分析。作文的多样性和学习方式的类型在能力上都存在显着差异。根据学习风格类型平均差异的检验，有些差异不大，但提供了基于学习风格类型选择学生群体中混合学习形式的基本指导。