当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-15 , DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7
M Şahin 1
Affiliation  

This study presents a comprehensive and comparative analysis of weighting and multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods in the context of sustainable energy. As the selection problems of energy involve various conflicting attributes, MADM methods have been widely applied in addressing these issues. In this study, six weighting and seven MADM methods that constitute a total of 42 models are implemented to evaluate different weighting and multicriteria decision-making methods and determine the most efficient and sustainable energy option. To determine the weights of economic, environmental, socioeconomic, and technical attributes, two subjective methods—the analytic hierarchy process and best–worst method—and four objective methods—the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation, Shannon's entropy, standard deviation, and mean weight—are used. Thus, both expert evaluations and data-based assessments are considered. Using each attribute weight provided by the six methods, the ranking of electricity generation options for Turkey is obtained through seven MADM methods: the elimination and choice expressing the reality method, the weighted sum method, the weighted product method, the organization, rangement et synthese de donnes relationnelles (ORESTE) method, the technique for order performance by similarity to the ideal solution, the preference ranking organization method for the enrichment of evaluations, and the multiple criteria optimization compromise solution. Rankings obtained from all models are integrated through the Borda, Copeland, and grade average methods. The results indicate that hydro is the optimal electricity generation option, followed by onshore wind, solar PV, geothermal, natural gas, and coal.



中文翻译:

可持续能源背景下的加权和多准则方法的综合分析

这项研究在可持续能源的背景下,对加权和多属性决策(MADM)方法进行了全面的比较分析。由于能量的选择问题涉及各种相互矛盾的属性,因此MADM方法已广泛应用于解决这些问题。在这项研究中,实施了六种加权和七种MADM方法(共构成42个模型),以评估不同的加权和多准则决策方法,并确定最有效和可持续的能源选择。要确定经济,环境,社会经济和技术属性的权重,可以使用两种主观方法(层次分析法和最差方法)以及四种客观方法(通过标准间相关性确定标准的重要性,香农熵,标准差,和平均体重。因此,既要考虑专家评估,也要考虑基于数据的评估。使用六种方法提供的每个属性权重,可通过七种MADM方法获得土耳其的发电选项排名:表示现实方法的消除和选择,加权和方法,加权乘积方法,组织,范围和综合关系法(ORESTE)方法,通过与理想解决方案相似性来执行订单的技术,用于丰富评估的偏好排序组织方法以及多准则优化折衷解决方案。通过Borda,Copeland和平均成绩方法对从所有模型获得的排名进行整合。结果表明,水力发电是最佳的发电选择,其次是陆上风能,太阳能光伏发电,地热发电,天然气和煤炭。

更新日期:2020-09-15
down
wechat
bug