当前位置: X-MOL 学术History of Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The "space" of history: A response to Graiver (2020), Rossano (2020), and Smail (2020).
History of Psychology ( IF 0.838 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-01 , DOI: 10.1037/hop0000177
Tracy B Henley 1
Affiliation  

Replies to comments by I. Gravier (see record 2020-68859-002), R. A. Blackwell and M. J. Rossano (see record 2020-68859-003), and D. L. Smail (see record 2020-68859-004) on the article by Henley (see record 2020-68859-001). That each of the commentators acknowledged the significance of the Neolithic for psychology was welcome, as were their alternative views on how such prehistoric events potentially fit with our discipline's history. As new scholarship continues to emerge related to Göbekli Tepe demonstrating radical changes in how Neolithic humans understood themselves, each other, and the world around them, Henley contends that this is significant for our chronicle of the nature of not just "psychology in history" but also deserves "space" within the history of psychology. To reiterate the last line from Smail's reply-"Now all we have to do is persuade the historians". (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

历史的“空间”:对Graiver(2020),Rossano(2020)和Smail(2020)的回应。

答复I.Gravier(请参阅记录2020-68859-002),RA Blackwell和MJ Rossano(请参阅记录2020-68859-003)和DL Smail(请参阅记录2020-68859-004)对Henley(请参阅记录2020-68859-001)。每个评论员都承认新石器时代对心理学的重要性,以及他们对这种史前事件如何与本学科历史相适应的看法也受到欢迎。随着与戈贝克利·特佩(GöbekliTepe)有关的新学者的不断涌现,证明了新石器时代人类如何理解自己,彼此以及周围的世界,亨利认为这对我们的历史编年史意义重大,不仅是“历史心理学”,而且在心理学史上也应有“空间”。重申Smail的最后一行 s答复:“现在我们要做的就是说服历史学家”。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-08-01
down
wechat
bug