This comment engages with Henley's (2020) proposal for a history of psychology that addresses important transformations in mind and behavior across all periods of humanity's deep history. To the extent that the history of psychology pays attention to the human past, Henley observes, that history is dominated by evolutionary perspectives focused on the biological changes that took place in the Pleistocene. Using the recent archaeological site of Göbekli Tepe as a case study, his article draws attention to important psychological changes that have taken place in the more recent past and have unfolded over shorter time scales. This comment seeks to amplify some of Henley's claims and, by advocating for a historical metanarrative described here as "psychology in history," proposes an alternative framework for achieving some of the goals that Henley has articulated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

历史心理学：《关于亨利的评论》（2020年）。

该评论与亨利（Henley，2020）关于心理学史的提议相吻合，该提议论及了人类历史上各个时期思想和行为的重要转变。亨利指出，在一定程度上，心理学史关注人类的过去，历史由进化论观点主导，而进化论观点则关注更新世中发生的生物学变化。他的文章以最近的GöbekliTepe考古遗址为例，提请人们注意最近发生的重要心理变化，这些变化已在较短的时间范围内展开。该评论旨在扩大亨利的某些主张，并主张此处描述为“历史心理学”的历史元叙事，为实现Henley提出的某些目标提出了一个替代框架。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。