当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Marital and Family Therapy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Eliciting Stance and Mitigating Therapist Authority in Open Dialogue Meetings
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy ( IF 2.577 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-17 , DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12454
Ben Ong 1, 2 , Scott Barnes 3 , Niels Buus 1, 4, 5, 6
Affiliation  

Open Dialogue is a collaborative systemic approach to working with families in crisis. A core feature is the creation of dialogue through the elicitation of a multiplicity of voices. Using conversation analysis, we studied 14 hr of Open Dialogue sessions. We found that therapists recurrently produced utterances containing “I’m wondering.” These utterances topicalized particular issues and invited stance positions from other participants while also allowing the therapist to mitigate their deontic authority and present potentially disaligning stances. Therapists thus exercised authority in eliciting stances, but provided recipients with multiple avenues for responding. These findings illustrate that therapist authority is not necessarily antithetical to dialogue and, in well‐crafted forms, may even be necessary for the creation of polyphony through the elicitation of multiple stances.

中文翻译:

在公开对话会议中激发立场并减轻治疗师的权威

开放式对话是一种与处于危机中的家庭合作的协作系统方法。一个核心特征是通过引发多种声音来创建对话。使用对话分析,我们研究了 14 小时的开放式对话会话。我们发现治疗师会反复说出包含“我想知道”的话语。这些话语针对特定问题并邀请其他参与者的立场立场,同时也允许治疗师减轻他们的道义权威并提出潜在的不一致立场。因此,治疗师在引出立场时行使了权威,但为接受者提供了多种回应途径。这些发现说明治疗师的权威不一定与对话对立,而且在精心设计的形式中,
更新日期:2020-09-17
down
wechat
bug