Reports an error in "Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations" by David M. Buss, Patrick K. Durkee, Todd K. Shackelford, Brian F. Bowdle, David P. Schmitt, Gary L. Brase, Jae C. Choe and Irina Trofimova (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, May 28, 2020, np). In the article, the third sentence in the Content level subsection in the Status Criteria More Central to Women section of the Results should appear instead as Fidelity, chastity/purity, and long-term mating success increase women's status more than men's. A coding error in Figure 7 for Dishonoring Family appeared. The corrected Figure 7 now appears. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-35662-001). Social status is a central and universal feature of our highly social species. Reproductively relevant resources, including food, territory, mating opportunities, powerful coalitional alliances, and group-provided health care, flow to those high in status and trickle only slowly to those low in status. Despite its importance and centrality to human social group living, the scientific understanding of status contains a large gap in knowledge-the precise criteria by which individuals are accorded high or low status in the eyes of their group members. It is not known whether there exist universal status criteria, nor the degree to which status criteria vary across cultures. Also unknown is whether status criteria are sex differentiated, and the degree of cross-cultural variability and consistency of sex-differentiated status criteria. The current article investigates status criteria across 14 countries (N = 2,751). Results provide the first systematic documentation of potentially universal and sex-differentiated status criteria. Discussion outlines important next steps in understanding the psychology of status. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

“人类地位标准：14个国家的性别差异和相似之处”：对Buss等人的更正。（2020）。

报告了David M. Buss，Patrick K.Durkee，Todd K.Shackelford，Brian F.Bowdle，David P.Schmitt，Gary L.Brase，Jae C在“人类状况标准：14个国家的性别差异和相似性”中的错误Choe和Irina Trofimova（人格与社会心理学杂志，高级在线出版物，2020年5月28日，np）。在文章中，结果的“状态标准对于女性来说更重要”部分的“内容级别”小节中的第三句话应该显示为“忠贞，贞洁/纯正和长期交配成功”可以使女性的地位比男性更多。在图7中出现了“耻辱家庭”的编码错误。现在将显示已更正的图7。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2020-35662-001中）。社会地位是我们高度社会化物种的核心和普遍特征。与生殖有关的资源，包括食物，领土，交配机会，强大的联盟联盟以及团体提供的医疗保健，流向地位高的国家，而缓慢地向地位低的国家trick流。尽管地位对人类社会群体生活具有重要意义和中心地位，但对地位的科学理解仍然存在很大的知识鸿沟，即在群体成员眼中，个人被赋予高低地位的精确标准。尚不知道是否存在普遍的地位标准，或者地位标准在不同文化之间的变化程度。同样未知的是地位标准是否存在性别差异，以及跨文化变异的程度和性别差异地位标准的一致性。目前的文章调查了14个国家/地区的状态标准（N = 2,751）。结果提供了潜在普遍性和性别差异状态标准的第一个系统文件。讨论概述了理解状态心理学的重要后续步骤。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。