The current article aims to examine the performance of two brief, dynamic risk measures – the Brockville Risk Checklist (BRC4) and one of two versions of the Hamilton Anatomy of Risk Management [HARM‐FV and electronic HARM‐FV (eHARM‐FV)] – scored at regular clinical case conferences for forensic psychiatric patients in two different settings. The eHARM represents a first‐in‐class dynamic risk assessment tool using data analytics.

中文翻译：

---

短期临床风险评估和管理：比较布罗克维尔风险清单和汉密尔顿风险管理剖析。

当前的文章旨在研究两种简短的动态风险度量的性能–布罗克维尔风险清单（BRC4）和汉密尔顿风险管理解剖学的两个版本之一[HARM-FV和电子HARM-FV（eHARM-FV）] –在常规的临床案例会议上为两种不同情况的法医精神病患者评分。eHARM代表使用数据分析的一流动态风险评估工具。