当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Moving-horizon versus moving-aircraft: Effectiveness of competing attitude indicator formats on recoveries from discrete and continuous attitude changes.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied ( IF 2.813 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-10 , DOI: 10.1037/xap0000329
Simon Müller 1 , Christian Korff 1 , Dietrich Manzey 1
Affiliation  

The present research revisits the old issue whether attitude information is best conveyed to pilots in a moving-horizon format or in a moving-aircraft format. Previous research has suggested that the moving-aircraft format might not be beneficial for flight path tracking but recoveries from unusual attitudes, although the result are not fully consistent. A limitation of studies to date is that the recovery task usually did not involve progressive attitude changes of the aircraft but only sudden discrete changes. Compared with a discrete stimulus, the continuous dynamics might increase the perceived time pressure to respond, which in turn can be expected to amplify the error proneness with a less intuitive format. Two experiments were conducted where flight novices and experienced pilots performed tracking and recover tasks with both formats. Recoveries were performed from both, sudden (discrete) and continuously developing attitude changes. Independent of whether novices or pilots were considered, the general superiority of the moving-aircraft format was confirmed. As expected, the benefits of this format became even more evident with progressive attitude changes. No differences were found for tracking. The results add to the evidence favoring the moving-aircraft over the moving-horizon format for both novices and pilots. The moving-aircraft format of the attitude indicator should at least be considered as a standard for new applications, such as ground control stations of unmanned aerial vehicles. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

移动地平线与移动飞机:竞争姿态指示器格式对从离散和连续姿态变化中恢复的有效性。

目前的研究重新审视了这个老问题,是将姿态信息以移动地平线格式还是以移动飞机格式最好地传达给飞行员。先前的研究表明,移动飞机格式可能不利于飞行路径跟踪,但有助于从异常姿态中恢复,尽管结果并不完全一致。迄今为止研究的一个局限性是恢复任务通常不涉及飞机的渐进姿态变化,而只是突然的离散变化。与离散刺激相比,连续动态可能会增加感知的响应时间压力,这反过来又会以不太直观的格式放大错误倾向。进行了两个实验,其中飞行新手和有经验的飞行员使用两种格式执行跟踪和恢复任务。从突然(离散)和持续发展的态度变化中进行恢复。无论是新手还是飞行员,都证实了移动飞机格式的普遍优势。正如预期的那样,随着态度的逐步改变,这种形式的好处变得更加明显。没有发现用于跟踪的差异。对于新手和飞行员来说,结果增加了有利于移动飞机而不是移动地平线格式的证据。姿态指示器的移动飞机格式至少应被视为新应用的标准,例如无人机的地面控制站。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。无论是新手还是飞行员,都证实了移动飞机格式的普遍优势。正如预期的那样,随着态度的逐步改变,这种形式的好处变得更加明显。没有发现用于跟踪的差异。对于新手和飞行员来说,结果增加了有利于移动飞机而不是移动地平线格式的证据。姿态指示器的移动飞机格式至少应被视为新应用的标准,例如无人机的地面控制站。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。无论是新手还是飞行员,都证实了移动飞机格式的普遍优势。正如预期的那样,随着态度的逐步改变,这种形式的好处变得更加明显。没有发现用于跟踪的差异。对于新手和飞行员来说,结果增加了有利于移动飞机而不是移动地平线格式的证据。姿态指示器的移动飞机格式至少应被视为新应用的标准,例如无人机的地面控制站。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。没有发现用于跟踪的差异。对于新手和飞行员来说,结果增加了有利于移动飞机而不是移动地平线格式的证据。姿态指示器的移动飞机格式至少应被视为新应用的标准,例如无人机的地面控制站。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。没有发现用于跟踪的差异。对于新手和飞行员来说,结果增加了有利于移动飞机而不是移动地平线格式的证据。姿态指示器的移动飞机格式至少应被视为新应用的标准,例如无人机的地面控制站。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-09-10
down
wechat
bug