当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Psychological Bulletin
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Personality, attitude, and demographic correlates of academic dishonesty: A meta-analysis.
Psychological Bulletin ( IF 22.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-07 , DOI: 10.1037/bul0000300 Samuel D Lee 1 , Nathan R Kuncel 1 , Jacob Gau 1
Psychological Bulletin ( IF 22.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-07 , DOI: 10.1037/bul0000300 Samuel D Lee 1 , Nathan R Kuncel 1 , Jacob Gau 1
Affiliation
Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = -.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = -.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = -.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = -.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
中文翻译:
学术不诚实的人格,态度和人口统计学相关因素:一项荟萃分析。
一个多世纪的研究集中在学生特征与学术不诚实之间的关系上。在这里,我们对以下三个广泛领域的大量文献进行了荟萃分析:人格,学术态度和历史信息,包括人口统计和先前的成就。在分析了来自75个样本的27,000多名参与者的相关性之后,几个关系特别突出。尽管从流行的五因素模型测得的尽责程度(ρ¯= -.25)和满意程度(ρ¯= -.13)的度量显示出与不诚实的重要关系,但对于特定的人格量表,包括冲动(ρ¯ = 0.39)和精神病(ρ= 0.40)。道德(ρ¯= -.24)和学术自我效能感(ρ¯=-。28)与较少的不诚实行为有关,但与中和措施相比,效果要小得多(ρ= .43),这是在合理的情况下证明和纠正不道德行为的趋势。假设被开发出来,结果被两个不诚实的学术竞争模型所框定。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-09-07
中文翻译:
学术不诚实的人格,态度和人口统计学相关因素:一项荟萃分析。
一个多世纪的研究集中在学生特征与学术不诚实之间的关系上。在这里,我们对以下三个广泛领域的大量文献进行了荟萃分析:人格,学术态度和历史信息,包括人口统计和先前的成就。在分析了来自75个样本的27,000多名参与者的相关性之后,几个关系特别突出。尽管从流行的五因素模型测得的尽责程度(ρ¯= -.25)和满意程度(ρ¯= -.13)的度量显示出与不诚实的重要关系,但对于特定的人格量表,包括冲动(ρ¯ = 0.39)和精神病(ρ= 0.40)。道德(ρ¯= -.24)和学术自我效能感(ρ¯=-。28)与较少的不诚实行为有关,但与中和措施相比,效果要小得多(ρ= .43),这是在合理的情况下证明和纠正不道德行为的趋势。假设被开发出来,结果被两个不诚实的学术竞争模型所框定。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。