当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Unethical Authorship in Scientific Publications (A Review of the Problem)
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Pub Date : 2020-03-11 , DOI: 10.3103/s0147688219040026
V. N. Gureev , I. G. Lakizo , N. A. Mazov

Abstract

Unfair authorship in scientific publications is one of the most common types of violations of publication ethics, which is associated either with the unfair inclusion among authors of persons who do not meet the criteria for authorship, or, conversely, with the concealment of the real performers of scientific work. The main reasons for the intense spread of unethical behavior in relation to authorship in recent years include the imperfection of the science management system, which requires high rates of publication activity from researchers; partly discriminatory policies of journals in relation to young authors, which force them to include authoritative scientists as co-authors; and conflicts of interest in medical publications, which prompt pharmaceutical companies to exclude real the performers of the work. The scientific and publishing international communities have been offered a set of approaches both to the fight against unfair authorship and to its prevention, including the development of additional criteria for authorship; clarification of instructions and guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors; and organization of training events to familiarize authors with the principles of publication ethics. The scientometric methods for identifying unacceptable types of authorship seem promising. This review article presents the current state of the problem and the ways to solve it that have been outlined by the professional community.


中文翻译:

科学出版物中的不道德著作权(对问题的评论)

摘要

科学出版物中的不公平作者身份是违反出版道德的最常见类型之一,这可能与不符合作者身份的人之间不公平地包含在作者中有关,或者相反地,其隐瞒了真正的表演者科学工作。近年来,与作者身份有关的不道德行为的广泛传播的主要原因包括科学管理体系的不完善,这要求研究人员进行大量的出版活动。与青年作者有关的期刊的部分歧视性政策,迫使它们包括权威科学家作为合著者;以及医疗出版物的利益冲突,促使制药公司将真正的表演者排除在外。已经为科学和出版国际社会提供了一系列方法来打击不正当作者权及其预防,包括制定额外的作者权标准;澄清针对作者,审稿人和编辑的指示和指南;组织培训活动,以使作者熟悉出版道德原则。识别不可接受的作者类型的科学计量方法似乎很有希望。这篇评论文章介绍了该问题的当前状态以及解决方法,这些方法已由专业人士概述。澄清针对作者,审稿人和编辑的指示和指南;组织培训活动,以使作者熟悉出版道德原则。识别不可接受的作者类型的科学计量方法似乎很有希望。这篇评论文章介绍了该问题的现状以及解决方法,这些都是专业人士概述的。澄清针对作者,审稿人和编辑的指示和指南;组织培训活动,以使作者熟悉出版道德原则。识别不可接受的作者类型的科学计量方法似乎很有希望。这篇评论文章介绍了该问题的现状以及解决方法,这些都是专业人士概述的。
更新日期:2020-03-11
down
wechat
bug