Abstract—

This article considers the problems of developing objective criteria for evaluating researchers. The approaches to assessing academic reputation are shown to be similar to those for assessing corporate goodwill. The elements that make up academic reputation are identified. A technique of ranking researchers by reputation that combines scientometric indicators with peer appraisal is proposed. The principle of selecting peer committee members based on bibliometric indicators is enunciated. The application of collective peer appraisal methods to the construction of the scales of the indicators of the proposed reputation ranking is shown. The concept of an automated system intended for compiling the proposed reputation ranking of researchers is presented.

中文翻译：

---

基于声誉责任标准的研究人员评价

摘要—

本文考虑了制定评估研究人员客观标准的问题。实践证明，评估学术声誉的方法与评估企业信誉的方法相似。确定构成学术声誉的要素。提出了一种将科学指标与同行评价相结合的按声誉对研究人员进行排名的技术。阐述了根据文献计量指标选择同行委员会成员的原则。展示了集体同伴评估方法在拟议声誉排名指标量表的构建中的应用。提出了旨在用于编制研究人员的声誉排名的自动化系统的概念。