(Im)mobilities are considered to encapsulate a broad range of projects that establish a ‘moment‐driven’ social science. I argue that moment driven research needs to be in conversation with an ethical document. It is how the ethical landscape responds to this increasingly dynamic and radically open interaction, while avoiding the excess dangers of institutionalised review that warrants more attention. Through the lens of two research projects, one based around relocated populations from post‐disaster Christchurch and the other on sharemilkers in the Waikato, mobilities and ethics are discussed. In short, the mobilities of participants altered the ethical dynamics of research.

中文翻译：

---

调动研究道德：新西兰奥特罗阿的两个例子

（Im）行动被认为涵盖了建立“时刻驱动”社会科学的广泛项目。我认为，瞬间驱动研究需要与道德文件进行交流。道德格局是如何应对这种日益动态和根本开放的互动的，同时避免了值得更多关注的制度化审查的过度危险。通过两个研究项目的视角，一个以灾后基督城的重新安置人口为基础，另一个以怀卡托的共享牛奶为基础，讨论了流动性和道德。简而言之，参与者的活动改变了研究的伦理动力。