当前位置: X-MOL 学术Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Discrepant Data and Improbable Results: An Examination of Vohs, Mead, and Goode (2006)
Basic and Applied Social Psychology ( IF 1.518 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-19 , DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2019.1624965
Doug Rohrer 1 , Harold Pashler 2 , Christine R. Harris 2
Affiliation  

Abstract A highly cited article by Vohs, Mead, and Goode (2006) reported several experiments in which an incidental reminder of money produced large effects on subsequent behaviors unrelated to money. We attempted 2 high-powered direct replications of the first experiment, which found that money-primed subjects worked on a puzzle nearly twice as long as controls before quitting. The replication studies showed no evidence of money priming. Moreover, 25% of the subjects in our studies solved the puzzle correctly or incorrectly, whereas none reportedly did so in the original study. We also list anomalies in the reported results of the original study.

中文翻译:

不一致的数据和不可能的结果:对 Vohs、Mead 和 Goode 的检查 (2006)

摘要 Vohs、Mead 和 Goode (2006) 的一篇被高度引用的文章报道了几个实验,在这些实验中,偶然的金钱提醒会对随后与金钱无关的行为产生巨大影响。我们尝试了第一个实验的 2 次高功率直接复制,发现在退出之前,金钱启动的受试者在谜题上的工作时间几乎是对照组的两倍。复制研究没有显示金钱启动的证据。此外,我们研究中 25% 的受试者正确或错误地解决了这个难题,而据报道在原始研究中没有人这样做。我们还列出了原始研究报告结果中的异常情况。
更新日期:2019-06-19
down
wechat
bug