We note two errors in our published paper and list the corrections below. The Gibbs (free) energy change (ΔG_et or ΔG⁰) for the electron transfer from N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA) to quantum dot (QD) in hexadecane should be read as +6.21 eV instead of +2.24 eV throughout the article and Table of Contents. The error occurred because we took the diameter of DMA instead of its radius. All the other free energy chage values in the paper were calculated using the radius of DMA. In eq 1, ε should be read as the permittivity of the solvent, which is obtained by multiplying the dielectric constant of a solvent by the permittivity of free space (8.85 × 10^–12 Fm^–1). The above-mentioned mistakes do not affect any of the experimental results, discussions, or conclusions reported in the paper. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers due to these errors. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

中文翻译：

---

在大正吉布斯（自由）能变化下，通过电子转移对高激发CdSe / ZnS量子点中的闪烁抑制进行校正。

我们在已发表的论文中注意到两个错误，并在下面列出了更正。电子在十六烷中从N，N-二甲基苯胺（DMA）转移到量子点（QD）的电子吉布斯（自由）能量变化（ΔG _et或ΔG ⁰）在整个过程中应读为+6.21 eV，而不是+2.24 eV文章和目录。发生错误是因为我们采用了DMA的直径而不是其半径。本文中所有其他自由能消耗值均使用DMA的半径进行计算。在等式1中，ε应理解为溶剂的介电常数，它是通过将溶剂的介电常数乘以自由空间的介电常数（8.85×10 ^–12 Fm ^–1）。上述错误不影响论文中报告的任何实验结果，讨论或结论。对于这些错误给读者带来的不便，我们深表歉意。本文尚未被其他出版物引用。