当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Physiol. Heart Circulat. Physiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Novel Noninvasive Estimation of Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation by Echocardiography and Expired Gas Analysis.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology ( IF 4.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-18 , DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00429.2020
Takeshi Onoue 1 , Mai Iwataki 1 , Masaru Araki 1 , Jun Akashi 1 , Tetsuji Kitano 1 , Yosuke Nabeshima 1 , Soshi Hei 1 , Yasufumi Nagata 1 , Atsushi Hayashi 1 , Yuki Tsuda 1 , Shinjo Sonoda 1 , Yoshihisa Fujino 2 , Robert A Levine 3 , Yutaka Otsuji 1
Affiliation  

Mixed venous oxygen (O2) saturation (SvO2) is an important measure to evaluate sufficiency of cardiac output (CO) relative to whole body O2 consumption (VO2), while clinical utilization is limited for required invasive catheterization. By Fick's equation, VO2 (ml/min) = CO (L/min) x Hb (g/dL) x 1.36 (ml/g) x (SaO2 - SvO2) / 10 [Hb = hemoglobin concentration, SaO2 = arterial blood O2 saturation]. Since VO2, CO, Hb and SaO2 can be measured noninvasively with expired gas analysis, echocardiography, simple blood test and percutaneous O2 saturation, SvO2 can be noninvasively calculated. We hypothesized that noninvasively calculated SvO2 shows significant correlation and agrees well with invasively measured SvO2. In 47 patients (29 men, mean age 70±12 years), SvO2 was directly measured by sampling pulmonary artery blood. Calculated SvO2 was also obtained by the method described above. Calculated SvO2 was significantly correlated with measured SvO2 (r = 0.79, P < 0.001) and significantly smaller than measured SvO2 (70±5.1 vs 72.1±4.9%, p < 0.001). Bias at SvO2 was -2.2% (95% confidence interval, -3.2 to -1.1%) with limits of agreement from -9.5 to 5.2%, demonstrating acceptable agreement. The optimal cut-offs values of calculated SvO2 was < 69% for reduced measured SvO2 < 70% with the area under the curve of 0.94. Reduced calculated SvO2 < 69% indicated a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 90.9% for reduced measured SvO2. Noninvasively calculated SvO2 significantly correlated and agreed well with directly measured SvO2. This novel method allows practical evaluation of SvO2 to assess sufficiency of CO according to VO2.

中文翻译:

通过超声心动图和呼出气体分析对混合静脉氧饱和度进行新型无创估计。

混合静脉氧 (O 2 ) 饱和度 (SvO 2 ) 是评估心输出量 (CO) 相对于全身 O 2消耗量 (VO 2 )充足性的重要措施,而临床应用受限于所需的侵入性导管插入术。通过Fick方程,VO 2(毫升/分钟)= CO(L /分)X HB(克/升)×1.36(毫升/克)×(血氧饱和2 - SVO 2)/ 10 [血红蛋白=血红蛋白浓度,血氧饱和度2 =动脉血O 2饱和度]。由于 VO 2、CO、Hb 和 SaO 2可以通过呼出气体分析、超声心动图、简单血液检测和经皮 O 2无创测量饱和度,SvO 2可以无创计算。我们假设无创计算的 SvO 2显示出显着的相关性,并且与有创测量的 SvO 2非常吻合。在 47 名患者(29 名男性,平均年龄 70±12 岁)中,通过采样肺动脉血直接测量SvO 2。计算的SvO 2也通过上述方法获得。计算的 SvO 2与测量的 SvO 2显着相关(r = 0.79,P < 0.001)并且显着小于测量的 SvO 2(70±5.1 vs 72.1±4.9%,p < 0.001)。SvO 2 的偏差为 -2.2%(95% 置信区间,-3.2 至 -1.1%),一致性范围为 -9.5 至 5.2%,表明一致性可接受。对于降低的测量 SvO 2 < 70% ,计算的 SvO 2的最佳截断值为< 69%,曲线下面积为 0.94。降低的计算 SvO 2 < 69% 表明降低的测量 SvO 2的灵敏度为 92.9%,特异性为 90.9% 。无创计算的 SvO 2与直接测量的 SvO 2显着相关并且非常吻合。这种新颖的方法允许对 SvO 2进行实际评估,以根据 VO 2评估 CO 的充足性。
更新日期:2020-09-20
down
wechat
bug