The conflict in the continental shelf in Ambalat’s Zone between Indonesia and Malaysia always end up with miserable deadlocks and legal uncertainty. The concentration of the offering solution only focuses on the aspect of sovereignty but does not criticize or highlighting the regulatory aspect regarding natural resources and biodiversity. Based on UNCLOS 1982, the coastal State has the right to enforce its authority on the continental shelf and this is implying that everything contained instead of them including natural resources, can be claimed by the coastal State itself. The Ambalat case is a very complex issue to be studied in this journal, where the continental shelf is claimed by two coastal states: Indonesia and Malaysia. Some previous research only emphasized ‘unsettled dispute settlement’ without providing legal certainty in the form of clear regulations regarding the existence and the regulation of natural resources on the continental shelf. This opens the Pandora’s bo...

中文翻译：

---

大陆架海洋自然资源政策的法律设想：Ambalt案例研究

印度尼西亚和马来西亚之间在安巴拉特地区大陆架上的冲突总是以悲惨的僵局和法律上的不确定性结束。提供解决方案的重点仅集中在主权方面，而没有批评或强调有关自然资源和生物多样性的监管方面。根据1982年《海洋法公约》，沿海国有权在大陆架上行使其权力，这意味着沿海国本身可以主张包括自然资源在内的所有物品，而不是包括自然资源在内的所有物。Ambalat案是一个非常复杂的问题，需要在该期刊中进行研究，该大陆架由两个沿海国家（印度尼西亚和马来西亚）宣称拥有主权。先前的一些研究仅强调“未解决的争端解决”，而没有以关于大陆架上自然资源的存在和监管的明确规定的形式提供法律确定性。这打开了潘多拉魔咒的宝藏。