当前位置: X-MOL 学术Dent. Mater. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial.
Dental Materials ( IF 5 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-12 , DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007
Thalita de Paris Matos 1 , Jorge Perdigão 2 , Eloisa de Paula 3 , Fabiana Coppla 4 , Viviane Hass 5 , Rafael F Scheffer 6 , Alessandra Reis 1 , Alessandro D Loguercio 1
Affiliation  

Objective

To evaluate the five-year clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU; 3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: SU-ERm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; SU-ERd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; SU-Set: selective enamel etching; and SU-SE: self-etch. A nanofilled composite resin was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 5 years using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The survival rates (retention/fractures) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank test. For the secondary outcomes, Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank was applied (α = 0.05).

Results

After 5 years the recall rate was 86%. The retention/fracture rates were 93% for Erm and ERd, 88.4% for SEet and 81.4% for SE. A significant difference was observed for SE vs. ERd and SE vs. ERm (p = 0.01). Also, marginal discoloration and adaptation showed significant differences with ERm and ERd resulting in fewer marginal discrepancies than SE (p < 0.05).

Significance

After 5 years, the clinical behavior of the universal adhesive in the etch-and-rinse strategy was better when compared to the self-etch strategy. The use of selective enamel etching is highly recommended for the self-etch strategy. The FDI and USPHS evaluation criteria showed similar results after 5 years.



中文翻译:

通用粘合剂的五年临床评估:一项随机双盲试验。

目的

使用两个评估标准评估Scotchbond通用胶粘剂(SU; 3M口腔护理,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)在非龋齿性宫颈病变(NCCL)中的五年临床表现。

方法

三十九名患者参加了这项研究。200个修复体分为四个组:SU-ERm:蚀刻和冲洗+湿润牙本质;SU-ERd:蚀刻漂洗+干燥牙本质;SU-Set:选择性搪瓷蚀刻;SU-SE:自蚀刻。将纳米填充的复合树脂逐渐放置。使用世界牙科联合会(FDI)和美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准在基线和5年后评估修复体。用Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验计算存活率(保留/骨折)。对于次要结局,应用了Friedman重复测量的方差分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

5年后,召回率达到86%。Er m和ER d的保留/断裂率分别为93 %,SE等的88.4%和SE的81.4%。观察到SE与ER d以及SE与ER m的显着差异(p = 0.01)。另外,边缘变色和适应性与ER mERd表现出显着差异,导致边缘差异小于SE(p <0.05)。

意义

5年后,与自蚀刻策略相比,通用粘合剂在蚀刻和冲洗策略中的临床表现更好。强烈建议将选择性搪瓷蚀刻用于自蚀刻策略。FDI和USPHS评估标准在5年后显示出相似的结果。

更新日期:2020-10-30
down
wechat
bug