Purpose

This article starts from the assumption that it is important for the evaluation of gender equality interventions in RTDI (Research, Technology Development and Innovation) to consider its context regarding gender equality regime and evaluation culture because this context does influence effects and long term impacts of such activities. It aims to provide key characteristics for the differentiation of gender equality regimes and evaluation regimes to be considered when designing policy interventions or evaluating specific gender equality interventions in RTDI.

Design/methodology/approach

After a literature review of relevant typologies for welfare state and gender equality regimes, it was analysed to which extent the seven EFFORTI countries correspond to certain typologies based on the data basis of the context research performed in the EFFORTI project. For this context research, international/national and qualitative/quantitative data regarding the relevant framework conditions were firstly collected for each of the EFFORTI countries and secondly compared in a cross-country analysis.

Findings

The research showed that when it comes to gender equality policies, most EFFORTI countries can either be assigned to the Social-Democratic category or Conservative Equal Employment Regime category in the typology of von Wahl (2005), with the latter type tending to provide less favourable conditions for women in the general labour market as well as women in RTDI (e.g. overtime culture). In how far these different types of context can have an impact on the evaluation of interventions can be exemplarily illustrated using case studies carried out as part of EFFORTI.

Connecting the typologies for gender equality policy with evaluation regimes has not proved fruitful, as the two discourses have only begun to converge in recent years. The evaluation regimes and cultures of the respective countries have therefore been described independently. However, it was shown that countries with more expertise in certain areas (e.g. gender, evaluations) developed more routinized and institutionalised procedures in the respective field.

Originality/value

Considering the different framework conditions is relevant when it comes to evaluation as different national contexts might require different policy and designs of activities, but might also shape the interventions’ effects. This article therefore aims to provide support in this regard for future evaluations of gender policies.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲的性别平等制度和评价制度及其对政策设计和评价的影响。

目的

本文从以下假设出发，即在评估 RTDI（研究、技术开发和创新）中的性别平等干预措施时，考虑其关于性别平等制度和评估文化的背景非常重要，因为这种背景确实会影响此类干预措施的效果和长期影响。活动。它旨在为区分性别平等制度和评估制度提供关键特征，以便在设计政策干预措施或评估 RTDI 中的特定性别平等干预措施时加以考虑。

设计/方法/方法

在对福利国家和性别平等制度的相关类型进行文献回顾后，根据 EFFORTI 项目中进行的背景研究的数据基础，分析了 7 个 EFFORTI 国家在何种程度上对应于某些类型。对于此背景研究，首先为每个 EFFORTI 国家收集有关相关框架条件的国际/国家和定性/定量数据，然后在跨国分析中进行比较。

发现

研究表明，在性别平等政策方面，大多数 EFFORTI 国家可以被归入 von Wahl (2005) 的类型学中的社会民主主义类别或保守的平等就业制度类别，而后一种类型往往提供不太有利的一般劳动力市场中的女性以及 RTDI 中的女性的条件（例如加班文化）。可以使用作为 EFFORTI 一部分进行的案例研究来举例说明这些不同类型的背景对干预措施评估的影响程度。

将性别平等政策的类型与评估制度联系起来并没有取得成果，因为这两种话语近年来才开始趋同。因此，各自国家的评估制度和文化是独立描述的。然而，研究表明，在某些领域（例如性别、评估）拥有更多专业知识的国家在各自领域制定了更加常规化和制度化的程序。

原创性/价值

在评估方面考虑不同的框架条件是相关的，因为不同的国家背景可能需要不同的政策和活动设计，但也可能影响干预措施的效果。因此，本文旨在为未来对性别政策的评估提供这方面的支持。