当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Counseling Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Distinguishing “I don’t see color” from “Racism is a thing of the past”: Psychological correlates of avoiding race and denying racism.
Journal of Counseling Psychology ( IF 5.088 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1037/cou0000427
Yara Mekawi 1 , Nathan R Todd 1 , Jacqueline Yi 1 , Emily J Blevins 1
Affiliation  

Scholars have proposed 2 separable dimensions of racial colorblind ideology: the first is centered on "not seeing color" (i.e., color evasion), and the second is centered on denying racism (i.e., power evasion). Yet, to date, there is no psychometric evidence for this distinction. In this article, we aim to fill this gap by establishing the presence of and characterizing differences between these 2 dimensions using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Study 1A (n = 707) provides exploratory factor analytic evidence supporting the separability of power and color evasion. Study 1B (n = 710) provides confirmatory evidence of this factor structure and evidence of discriminant validity. In Study 1B, 3 latent profiles based on power and color evasion were identified: acknowledgers (low color evasion, low power evasion), evaders (high color evasion, average power evasion), and deniers (average color evasion, average power evasion), which differed on relevant variables (e.g., modern racism, support for affirmative-action). In Study 2 (n = 546), these profiles were replicated and extended by examining differences in attitudes and desire to engage in campus diversity activities. Implications for racial colorblind ideology theory and practical applications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

区分“我看不到颜色”和“种族主义已成为过去”:避免种族和否认种族主义的心理关联。

学者们提出了种族色盲意识形态的两个可分离维度:第一个以“看不见颜色”为中心(即逃避颜色),第二个以否认种族主义为中心(即逃避权力)。然而,迄今为止,没有关于这种区别的心理测量证据。在本文中,我们旨在通过使用以变量为中心和以人为中心的方法来确定这两个维度之间的差异并对其进行表征来填补这一空白。研究 1A(n = 707)提供了探索性因素分析证据,支持权力和颜色规避的可分离性。研究 1B (n = 710) 提供了这种因素结构的确证证据和区分效度的证据。在研究 1B 中,确定了 3 个基于能力和颜色逃避的潜在特征:确认者(低颜色逃避,低能力逃避),逃避者(高颜色逃避,平均权力逃避)和否认者(平均颜色逃避,平均权力逃避),它们在相关变量上有所不同(例如,现代种族主义,对平权行动的支持)。在研究 2 (n = 546) 中,通过检查参与校园多样性活动的态度和愿望的差异,复制和扩展了这些概况。讨论了对种族色盲意识形态理论和实际应用的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。通过检查参与校园多样性活动的态度和愿望的差异,复制和扩展了这些概况。讨论了对种族色盲意识形态理论和实际应用的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。通过检查参与校园多样性活动的态度和愿望的差异,复制和扩展了这些概况。讨论了对种族色盲意识形态理论和实际应用的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-04-01
down
wechat
bug