Reports an error in "When poor communication does and does not matter: The moderating role of stress" by Teresa P. Nguyen, Benjamin R. Karney and Thomas N. Bradbury (Journal of Family Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Feb 20, 2020, np). There are two errors in the last sentence of the fifth paragraph (Model 4: Fluctuations in Cumulative Stress X Fluctuations in Behavior) of the Results section whereby the text "less cumulative stress" and "less stress" should have read "more cumulative stress" and "more stress," respectively. Thus, the correct sentence is as follows: "Specifically, relative increases in observed dyadic negativity were associated with decreases in husbands' relationship satisfaction when husbands also experienced more cumulative stress, whereas decreases in observed negativity in the presence of more stress were associated with increases in husbands' satisfaction (t = -2.00, p = .045, see Figure 1 and Table 2, Model 4)." Note that the findings are correctly stated elsewhere in the article. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-11898-001.) Although a number of theoretical perspectives in relationship science argue that variability in couples' relationship satisfaction over time is driven by changes in their communication, tests of this hypothesis have been limited to single assessments of behavior. To address this gap, we examine within-couple, across-time changes in communication, and we argue further that couples' external circumstances might combine with these behavioral changes to generate changes in relationship satisfaction. Using self-reports of satisfaction and in-home observational data collected 4 times at 9-month intervals from 414 newlywed couples, we show that fluctuations in dyadic behavior and spousal stress covary with fluctuations in spousal satisfaction. Tests of the interaction between fluctuations in stress and behavior reveal that husbands who experience upward fluctuations in negativity also experience decreases in relationship satisfaction at the same wave but only if they are concurrently experiencing greater stress than usual. Downward fluctuations in problem-solving effectiveness are associated with lower relationship satisfaction but only among spouses who had chronically high levels of cumulative stress; when chronic stress is low, reduced problem-solving effectiveness is unrelated to satisfaction. Exclusive focus on between-couple variability in couple communication, without regard for the stressors that couples face, will likely restrict the understanding and prevention of relationship distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

更正阮等人。（2020）。

Teresa P. Nguyen，Benjamin R.Karney和Thomas N.Bradbury（家庭心理学杂志，高级在线出版物，2020年2月20日， np）。结果部分第五段的最后一句话（模型4：累积压力的波动X行为的波动）有两个错误，其中文本“较少的累积压力”和“较少的压力”应显示为“较高的累积压力”。和“更多压力”。因此，正确的句子如下：“具体来说，当丈夫也承受更多的累积压力时，观察到的二元否定性的相对增加与丈夫的关系满意度降低有关，使用满意度的自我报告和从414个新婚夫妇那里以9个月的时间间隔收集了4次家庭观察数据，我们发现二元行为和配偶压力的波动随配偶满意度的波动而变化。对压力波动和行为波动之间相互作用的测试表明，丈夫经历消极情绪向上波动的情况下，同一波情绪关系满意度也会下降，但前提是他们同时承受比平常更大的压力。解决问题的有效性的向下波动与较低的关系满意度相关，但仅在长期具有较高累积压力的配偶中；当长期压力低时，解决问题的有效性降低与满意度无关。在不考虑夫妻所面对的压力的情况下，仅关注夫妻交流中夫妻之间的变异性可能会限制对关系困扰的理解和预防。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。