当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Sci. Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers
Environmental Science & Policy ( IF 6 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.021
Ko Konno 1 , Samantha H Cheng 2 , Jacqualyn Eales 3 , Geoff Frampton 4 , Christian Kohl 5 , Barbara Livoreil 6 , Biljana Macura 7 , Bethan C O'Leary 8, 9 , Nicola P Randall 10 , Jessica J Taylor 11 , Paul Woodcock 12 , Andrew S Pullin 1
Affiliation  

Evidence-informed decision-making aims to deliver effective actions informed by the best available evidence. Given the large quantity of primary literature, and time constraints faced by policy-makers and practitioners, well-conducted evidence reviews can provide a valuable resource to support decision-making. However, previous research suggests that some evidence reviews may not be sufficiently reliable to inform decisions in the environmental sector due to low standards of conduct and reporting. While some evidence reviews are of high reliability, there is currently no way for policy-makers and practitioners to quickly and easily find them among the many lower reliability ones. Alongside this lack of transparency, there is little incentive or support for review authors, editors and peer-reviewers to improve reliability. To address these issues, we introduce a new online, freely available and first-of-its-kind evidence service: the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER: www.environmentalevidence.org/ceeder). CEEDER aims to transform communication of evidence review reliability to researchers, policy-makers and practitioners through independent assessment of key aspects of the conduct, reporting and data limitations of available evidence reviews claiming to assess environmental impacts or the effectiveness of interventions relevant to policy and practice. At the same time, CEEDER will provide support to improve the standards of future evidence reviews and support evidence translation and knowledge mobilisation to help inform environmental decision-making.

中文翻译:

CEEDER 证据审查数据库:面向研究人员和决策者的开放获取证据服务

循证决策旨在根据最佳可用证据采取有效行动。鉴于大量原始文献以及政策制定者和从业者面临的时间限制,良好的证据审查可以为支持决策提供宝贵的资源。然而,之前的研究表明,由于行为和报告标准较低,一些证据审查可能不足以为环境部门的决策提供信息。虽然一些证据审查具有很高的可靠性,但目前政策制定者和从业者无法在众多可靠性较低的证据中快速轻松地找到它们。除了缺乏透明度之外,评论作者、编辑和同行评审员也没有什么动力或支持来提高可靠性。为了解决这些问题,我们推出了一项全新的、免费的、首创的在线证据服务:证据审查的环境证据数据库协作(CEEDER:www.environmentalevidence.org/ceeder)。CEEDER 旨在通过对声称评估环境影响或与政策和实践相关的干预措施有效性的现有证据审查的行为、报告和数据限制的关键方面进行独立评估,转变与研究人员、政策制定者和从业者之间的证据审查可靠性交流. 同时,CEEDER 将提供支持以提高未来证据审查的标准,并支持证据翻译和知识动员,以帮助为环境决策提供信息。证据审查的环境证据数据库协作(CEEDER:www.environmentalevidence.org/ceeder)。CEEDER 旨在通过对声称评估环境影响或与政策和实践相关的干预措施有效性的现有证据审查的行为、报告和数据限制的关键方面进行独立评估,转变与研究人员、政策制定者和从业者之间的证据审查可靠性交流. 同时,CEEDER 将提供支持以提高未来证据审查的标准,并支持证据翻译和知识动员,以帮助为环境决策提供信息。证据审查的环境证据数据库协作(CEEDER:www.environmentalevidence.org/ceeder)。CEEDER 旨在通过对声称评估环境影响或与政策和实践相关的干预措施有效性的现有证据审查的行为、报告和数据限制的关键方面进行独立评估,转变与研究人员、政策制定者和从业者之间的证据审查可靠性交流. 同时,CEEDER 将提供支持以提高未来证据审查的标准,并支持证据翻译和知识动员,以帮助为环境决策提供信息。CEEDER 旨在通过对声称评估环境影响或与政策和实践相关的干预措施有效性的现有证据审查的行为、报告和数据限制的关键方面进行独立评估,转变与研究人员、政策制定者和从业者之间的证据审查可靠性交流. 同时,CEEDER 将支持提高未来证据审查的标准,并支持证据翻译和知识动员,以帮助为环境决策提供信息。CEEDER 旨在通过对声称评估环境影响或与政策和实践相关的干预措施有效性的现有证据审查的行为、报告和数据限制的关键方面进行独立评估,转变与研究人员、政策制定者和从业者之间的证据审查可靠性交流. 同时,CEEDER 将提供支持以提高未来证据审查的标准,并支持证据翻译和知识动员,以帮助为环境决策提供信息。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug