当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Comput. Des. Eng. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Rules and validation processes for interoperable BIM data exchange
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering ( IF 4.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-27 , DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwaa064
Yong-Cheol Lee 1 , Charles M Eastman 2 , Wawan Solihin 3
Affiliation  

Abstract
Diverse industries have recognized the significance of a neutral data standard for seamless building information modeling (BIM) data exchanges and adopted commonly agreed schemes such as the industry foundation classes (IFC) schema for enhancing BIM data interoperability. To selectively employ domain-specific data exchange requirements, the AEC-FM (the Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Facility Management) industries have developed their own schema with a subset of the IFC schema, named a model view definition (MVD). However, because of latent human errors, inadequate MVD definitions, and error-prone data mapping problems, the adoption of IFC for exchanging and sharing BIM data is frequently limited with severe data integrity issues. This challenging situation requires the detailed examination of the limitations of the heterogeneous IFC translation processes of the current BIM authoring and application tools. To accomplish this objective, the authors thoroughly investigated the two MVDs, the Coordination View Version 2.0 and the Construction Operations Building Information Exchange, broadly used as an international standard for developing the IFC translation processes, and then identified their intrinsic requirements/rules and developed rule-based data validation processes. These new intrinsic knowledge of the two MVD specifications will be fundamental foundations to create coherent BIM data exchange systems that are currently scattered and dispersed in heterogeneous IFC translation processes and structures. Newly revealed rules pertaining to these two MVDs have been executed with IfcDoc, which is the IFC documentation tool. This BIM data validation process is expected to not only accurately evaluate the translation processes between BIM native data and IFC ones but also help industry professionals ensure the integrity and the accuracy of their BIM data according to the BIM data exchange standards using the two MVDs. In addition, the outcomes of this research study are expected to bolster the interoperable BIM adoption and offer the values of greater consistency of BIM data exchange.


中文翻译:

可互操作的BIM数据交换的规则和验证过程

摘要
不同的行业已经认识到中立的数据标准对无缝建筑信息模型(BIM)数据交换的重要性,并采用了公认的方案,例如行业基础类(IFC)模式来增强BIM数据的互操作性。为了有选择地采用特定领域的数据交换要求,AEC-FM(建筑,工程,施工和设施管理)行业已经开发了自己的架构,并带有IFC架构的子集,称为模型视图定义(MVD)。但是,由于潜在的人为错误,不正确的MVD定义以及容易出错的数据映射问题,使用IFC交换和共享BIM数据经常受到严重数据完整性问题的限制。这种具有挑战性的情况要求详细检查当前BIM创作和应用工具的异构IFC翻译过程的局限性。为了实现此目标,作者彻底研究了两种MVD(协调视图版本2.0)和建筑运营建筑物信息交换,这被广泛用作开发IFC翻译过程的国际标准,然后确定了它们的内在要求/规则和制定的规则。基于数据的验证过程。这两个MVD规范的新的内在知识将成为创建一致的BIM数据交换系统的基础,这些数据交换系统目前分散并分散在异构的IFC转换过程和结构中。与这两个MVD有关的新显示规则已由IFC文档工具IfcDoc执行。这个BIM数据验证过程不仅可以准确评估BIM本地数据和IFC数据之间的转换过程,而且可以帮助行业专业人员根据使用两个MVD的BIM数据交换标准,确保其BIM数据的完整性和准确性。此外,这项研究的结果有望促进可互操作的BIM的采用,并为BIM数据交换提供更大的一致性。这个BIM数据验证过程不仅可以准确评估BIM本地数据和IFC数据之间的转换过程,而且可以帮助行业专业人员根据使用两个MVD的BIM数据交换标准,确保其BIM数据的完整性和准确性。此外,这项研究的结果有望促进可互操作的BIM的采用,并为BIM数据交换提供更大的一致性。这个BIM数据验证过程不仅可以准确评估BIM本地数据和IFC数据之间的转换过程,而且可以帮助行业专业人员根据使用两个MVD的BIM数据交换标准,确保其BIM数据的完整性和准确性。此外,这项研究的结果有望促进可互操作的BIM的采用,并为BIM数据交换提供更大的一致性。
更新日期:2020-08-27
down
wechat
bug