Societal opposition has the potential to slow down the implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). One of the difficulties is that the perceived benefits associated with a CCS facility for local communities tend to be low compared to its perceived burdens. As is the case for other low carbon technologies, community compensation (or community benefits) has been suggested as a way to restore this perceived imbalance. A diverse literature has looked into the role of community compensation across various land uses and research fields. Synthesis is limited, while at the same time, the provision of community compensation in practice is moving from an ad hoc to a more institutionalized approach. Therefore, it is important to take stock of the literature. This paper provides a review of the community compensation literature in the form of four debates, drawing together environmental social science research on different low carbon technologies (e.g. CCS, renewable energy). In addition, current practices in community compensation for four European countries are discussed. The two parts of this paper are brought together in a set of lessons for the provision of community compensation for future CCS projects; in turn, suggestions for further research are made to address remaining knowledge gaps.

社会上的反对意见有可能减缓碳捕集与封存（CCS）的实施。困难之一是，与CCS设施给当地社区带来的收益相比，其感知负担往往较低。与其他低碳技术一样，有人提出了社区补偿（或社区利益）作为恢复这种不平衡感的方法。各种各样的文献研究了社区补偿在各种土地利用和研究领域中的作用。综合是有限的，同时，在实践中，提供社区补偿的方式正在从临时方法转变为更加制度化的方法。因此，盘点文献很重要。本文以四次辩论的形式回顾了社区补偿文献，将对不同低碳技术（例如CCS，可再生能源）的环境社会科学研究集中在一起。此外，还讨论了四个欧洲国家在社区补偿方面的现行做法。本文的两个部分结合在一起，为为将来的CCS项目提供社区补偿提供了一系列经验教训。反过来，提出了进一步研究的建议，以解决剩余的知识空白。本文的两个部分结合在一起，为为将来的CCS项目提供社区补偿提供了一系列的经验教训。反过来，提出了进一步研究的建议，以解决剩余的知识空白。本文的两个部分结合在一起，为为将来的CCS项目提供社区补偿提供了一系列经验教训。反过来，提出了进一步研究的建议，以解决剩余的知识空白。