Abstract In an acquaintance society, reputation plays an important role in individuals’ activities. Especially when we face with collective decision-making, such as crowd-funding. The existence of reputation could stimulate cooperation. In this work, individuals’ reputation has been divided into being good, bad and medium according to their neighbors’ judgement. Considering people with different requirements of reputation, we put forward a new reputation scoring mechanism with tolerance based on historical donations. First, we study the effect of different scoring rules on players’ strategies. Based on this, we discuss the effect of neighbors’ reputation on players’ simulation process. In addition, we explore the population structure’s influence on cooperation. Through numerical simulations, we are glad to find that the strict scoring rules could better stimulate cooperation in most circumstances. Moreover, imitation which depends on both reputation and payoff could promote cooperation. And individuals with good reputation have better effect on cooperation compared to those with bad reputation. This work provides a new reference for organizers to promote more people to participate and cooperate in Public Goods Game (PGG).

中文翻译：

---

公益博弈中基于历史捐赠的声誉评分机制促进合作

摘要 在熟人社会中，声誉在个人活动中扮演着重要的角色。尤其是当我们面临集体决策时，例如众筹。声誉的存在可以促进合作。在这项工作中，个人的声誉根据邻居的判断分为好、坏和中等。考虑到人们对声誉的不同要求，我们提出了一种新的基于历史捐赠的具有容忍度的声誉评分机制。首先，我们研究了不同的计分规则对玩家策略的影响。在此基础上，我们讨论了邻居声誉对玩家模拟过程的影响。此外，我们探讨了人口结构对合作的影响。通过数值模拟，我们很高兴地发现，在大多数情况下，严格的评分规则可以更好地激发合作。此外，依赖于声誉和回报的模仿可以促进合作。与声誉差的个体相比，声誉良好的个体对合作的影响更大。这项工作为主办方促进更多人参与和合作公共物品游戏（PGG）提供了新的参考。