当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Construct Validity of Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) Scores in Clinical Samples: Extension of Harris, Murphy, and Rakes’ (2019) Narrative Review
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work Pub Date : 2020-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/26408066.2020.1784345
Scott T Meier 1
Affiliation  

PURPOSE A recent review of 24 studies primarily evaluated psychometric properties of the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) related to coefficient alpha and convergent validity. METHOD To provide a fuller picture, this review examined effect size (ES) estimates and the full range of correlations between ORS scores and related measures. RESULTS Mean ORS ESs equaled 1.00 for 44 comparison periods. ORS scores correlated highest with measures of depression and evidenced larger ESs in depression treatments. DISCUSSION The ORS functions as a robust measure for detecting client progress in clinical samples that were primarily young, female, and Caucasian. Some results suggest ORS scores primarily reflect a rapid response to interventions. CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS Future research should assess ORS scores' psychometric properties in response to interventions with more heterogeneous client samples as well as its capacity to monitor change beyond initial sessions.

中文翻译:

在临床样本中构建结果评定量表 (ORS) 评分的有效性:Harris、Murphy 和 Rakes (2019) 叙事评论的扩展

目的 最近对 24 项研究的回顾主要评估了与系数 alpha 和收敛效度相关的结果评定量表 (ORS) 的心理测量特性。方法 为了提供更全面的图片,本综述检查了效应量 (ES) 估计值以及 ORS 评分与相关测量值之间的全部相关性。结果 44 个比较期的平均 ORS ES 等于 1.00。ORS 分数与抑郁症的测量相关性最高,并且在抑郁症治疗中证明了更大的 ES。讨论 ORS 用作检测客户在主要是年轻、女性和高加索人的临床样本中的进展的有力措施。一些结果表明 ORS 评分主要反映了对干预措施的快速反应。结论和局限 未来的研究应该评估 ORS 分数
更新日期:2020-07-03
down
wechat
bug