Osiurak and Reynaud's account of human tool cognition misses key element: human capacity for functional representations and teleological inferences. I argue that the teleofunctional approach accounts better for some features of human tool cognition and points to a viable candidate for the cognitive “difference-maker” behind human technological success.

中文翻译：

---

人类工具认知依赖于目的论

Osiurak 和 Reynaud 对人类工具认知的描述遗漏了关键要素：人类功能表征和目的论推理的能力。我认为远程功能方法更好地解释了人类工具认知的某些特征，并指出了人类技术成功背后的认知“差异制造者”的可行候选者。