当前位置: X-MOL 学术Fisheries › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Knowledge co‐production: A pathway to effective fisheries management, conservation, and governance
Fisheries ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-08 , DOI: 10.1002/fsh.10512
Steven J. Cooke 1, 2 , Vivian M. Nguyen 3 , Jacqueline M. Chapman 4 , Andrea J. Reid 4, 5 , Sean J. Landsman 3 , Nathan Young 6 , Scott G. Hinch 7 , Stephan Schott 8 , Nicholas E. Mandrak 9 , Christina A.D. Semeniuk 10
Affiliation  

Although it is assumed that the outcomes from scientific research inform management and policy, the so‐called knowledge–action gap (i.e., the disconnect between scientific knowledge and its application) is a recognition that there are many reasons why new knowledge is not always embraced by knowledge users. The concept of knowledge co‐production has gained popularity within the environmental and conservation research communities as a mechanism of bridging the gap between knowledge and action, but has yet to be fully embraced in fisheries research. Here we describe what co‐production is, outline its benefits (relative to other approaches to research) and challenges, and provide practical guidance on how to embrace and enact knowledge co‐production within fisheries research. Because co‐production is an iterative and context‐dependent process, there is no single way to do it, but there are best practices that can facilitate the generation of actionable research through respectful and inclusive partnerships. We present several brief case studies where we describe examples of where co‐production has worked in practice and the benefits it has accrued. As more members of the fisheries science and management community effectively engage in co‐production, it will be important to reflect on the processes and share lessons with others. We submit that co‐production has manifold benefits for applied science and should lead to meaningful improvements in fisheries management, conservation, and governance.

中文翻译:

知识共同生产:通往有效渔业管理,保护和治理的途径

尽管假定科学研究的结果会为管理和政策提供信息,但是所谓的知识-行动鸿沟(即科学知识及其应用之间的脱节)是一种认识,表明有很多原因导致人们并不总是采用新知识由知识用户。知识共同生产的概念作为弥合知识与行动之间差距的一种机制,已在环境和保护研究界广为流行,但尚未在渔业研究中得到充分采用。在这里,我们描述什么是联合生产,概述其益处(相对于其他研究方法)和挑战,并就如何在渔业研究中纳入和实施知识联合生产提供实践指导。由于联合制作是一个迭代且依赖于上下文的过程,没有唯一的方法可以做到这一点,但是有一些最佳实践可以通过尊重和包容的伙伴关系促进可操作研究的产生。我们提供了几个简短的案例研究,在这些案例中,我们描述了联合生产在实践中发挥作用的实例以及它所产生的收益。随着越来越多的渔业科学和管理界成员有效地参与联合生产,重要的是反思这些过程并与他人分享经验教训。我们认为,联合生产对应用科学有很多好处,并应导致渔业管理,保护和治理方面的有意义的改进。我们提供了几个简短的案例研究,在这些案例中,我们描述了联合生产在实践中发挥作用的实例以及它带来的收益。随着越来越多的渔业科学和管理界成员有效地参与联合生产,对过程进行反思并与他人分享经验将非常重要。我们认为,联合生产对应用科学有很多好处,并应导致渔业管理,保护和治理方面的有意义的改进。我们提供了几个简短的案例研究,在这些案例中,我们描述了联合生产在实践中发挥作用的实例以及它带来的收益。随着越来越多的渔业科学和管理界成员有效地参与联合生产,对过程进行反思并与他人分享经验将非常重要。我们认为,联合生产对应用科学有很多好处,并应导致渔业管理,保护和治理方面的有意义的改进。
更新日期:2020-08-08
down
wechat
bug