当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecosyst. Serv. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing
Ecosystem Services ( IF 7.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-07 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
Aleksandra Kosanic , Jan Petzold

Environmental degradation is increasing globally through direct anthropogenic interventions, such as urbanisation and unsustainable land use, and human-induced drivers, such as climate change. A result is the loss of ecosystem services. The way humans benefit from diverse ecosystem services for their physical and mental wellbeing differs from place to place and between communities and social groups. While the existing research on ecosystem services is rich on the relevance of provisioning ecosystem services for human wellbeing, the role of cultural ecosystem services is not sufficiently understood. Moreover, a variety of methods and a wide range of approaches are adopted to study how landscapes provide ecosystem services and how important they are for different people. Therefore, this paper systematically reviews where and how cultural ecosystem services are studied explicitly with respect to aspects of human physical and mental wellbeing and various social groups. Our review provides an overview of research biases and gaps that need to be addressed to advance our understanding of this link, which is critical to implementing meaningful environmental conservation and protection for local communities and vulnerable populations.



中文翻译:

对文化生态系统服务和人类福祉的系统评价

通过直接的人为干预(例如城市化和不可持续的土地利用)以及人为驱动因素(例如气候变化),全球环境恶化正在加剧。结果是生态系统服务的丧失。人类从多样化的生态系统服务中获得身心健康的方式因地而异,在社区和社会群体之间也不同。尽管现有的生态系统服务研究在为人类福祉提供生态系统服务的相关性方面很丰富,但对文化生态系统服务的作用还没有得到足够的了解。此外,采用了多种方法和多种方法来研究景观如何提供生态系统服务以及它们对不同人的重要性。因此,本文系统地回顾了在人类身心健康和各个社会群体方面明确研究文化生态系统服务的地点和方式。我们的审查概述了研究偏见和差距,以增进我们对这一联系的认识,这对于实现对当地社区和弱势群体的有意义的环境保护和保护至关重要。

更新日期:2020-08-07
down
wechat
bug