当前位置: X-MOL 学术Brain Stimul. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the ‘Big TMS Data Collaboration’
Brain Stimulation ( IF 7.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.018
Daniel T Corp 1 , Hannah G K Bereznicki 2 , Gillian M Clark 2 , George J Youssef 3 , Peter J Fried 4 , Ali Jannati 5 , Charlotte B Davies 2 , Joyce Gomes-Osman 6 , Julie Stamm 7 , Sung Wook Chung 8 , Steven J Bowe 9 , Nigel C Rogasch 10 , Paul B Fitzgerald 11 , Giacomo Koch 12 , Vincenzo Di Lazzaro 13 , Alvaro Pascual-Leone 14 , Peter G Enticott 2 ,
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Many studies have attempted to identify the sources of interindividual variability in response to theta-burst stimulation (TBS). However, these studies have been limited by small sample sizes, leading to conflicting results. OBJECTIVE /Hypothesis: This study brought together over 60 TMS researchers to form the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration', and create the largest known sample of individual participant TBS data to date. The goal was to enable a more comprehensive evaluation of factors driving TBS response variability. METHODS 118 corresponding authors of TMS studies were emailed and asked to provide deidentified individual TMS data. Mixed-effects regression investigated a range of individual and study level variables for their contribution to variability in response to iTBS and cTBS. RESULTS 430 healthy participants' TBS data was pooled across 22 studies (mean age = 41.9; range = 17-82; females = 217). Baseline MEP amplitude, age, target muscle, time of day, and TMS machine significantly predicted iTBS-induced plasticity. Baseline MEP amplitude, and timepoint after TBS significantly predicted cTBS-induced plasticity. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest known study of interindividual variability in TBS. Our findings indicate that a significant portion of variability can be attributed to the methods used to measure the modulatory effects of TBS. We provide specific methodological recommendations in order to control and mitigate these sources of variability.

中文翻译:

大规模分析 theta-burst 刺激数据的个体差异:“大 TMS 数据协作”的结果

背景 许多研究试图确定响应 theta-burst 刺激 (TBS) 的个体差异的来源。然而,这些研究受到小样本量的限制,导致结果相互矛盾。目标/假设:这项研究汇集了 60 多名 TMS 研究人员,形成了“大 TMS 数据协作”,并创建了迄今为止最大的已知个体参与者 TBS 数据样本。目标是能够对驱动 TBS 反应变异性的因素进行更全面的评估。方法 向 TMS 研究的 118 名通讯作者发送电子邮件,并要求他们提供未识别身份的个人 TMS 数据。混合效应回归研究了一系列个体和研究水平变量对 iTBS 和 cTBS 响应的变异性的贡献。结果 430 名健康参与者 TBS 数据汇集了 22 项研究(平均年龄 = 41.9;范围 = 17-82;女性 = 217)。基线 MEP 振幅、年龄、目标肌肉、一天中的时间和 TMS 机器显着预测了 iTBS 诱导的可塑性。基线 MEP 幅度和 TBS 后的时间点显着预测了 cTBS 诱导的可塑性。结论 这是已知最大的 TBS 个体间变异性研究。我们的研究结果表明,可变性的很大一部分可归因于用于测量 TBS 调节作用的方法。我们提供具体的方法学建议,以控制和减轻这些可变性来源。基线 MEP 幅度和 TBS 后的时间点显着预测了 cTBS 诱导的可塑性。结论 这是已知最大的 TBS 个体间变异性研究。我们的研究结果表明,可变性的很大一部分可归因于用于测量 TBS 调节作用的方法。我们提供具体的方法学建议,以控制和减轻这些可变性来源。基线 MEP 幅度和 TBS 后的时间点显着预测了 cTBS 诱导的可塑性。结论 这是已知最大的 TBS 个体间变异性研究。我们的研究结果表明,可变性的很大一部分可归因于用于测量 TBS 调节作用的方法。我们提供具体的方法学建议,以控制和减轻这些可变性来源。
更新日期:2020-09-01
down
wechat
bug